Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Summary of proposals: IPv4 Runout Management

Omo Oaiya Omo.Oaiya at
Thu Nov 10 07:37:15 UTC 2016

Thanks for spelling out Noah. Some seem to miss this basic fact.

Which is why I found the LACNIC presentation of IPv6 penetration vs usage
was quite instructive.


On 10 Nov 2016 8:15 a.m., "Noah" <noah at> wrote:

> If people want to deploy IPv6 they will do it but the compeling reason
> will eventually be competition as the motivation and nothing else.
> Atleast folk i know who do it dont even dual stack in their core as the
> prefix basically just seats on their boader router facing their ISP for the
> purpose of announcing it and that is it.
> So announcing an IPv6 prefix to an upstream provider imho doesnt cut it
> and its easy to do.
> Noah
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list