Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Summary of proposals: IPv4 Runout Management
Omo Oaiya
Omo.Oaiya at wacren.net
Thu Nov 10 01:38:25 UTC 2016
On 8 November 2016 at 23:49, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> > like this one:
> > % Information related to '2001:43f8:1d0::/48'
> >
> > % No abuse contact registered for 2001:43f8:1d0::/48
> >
> > inet6num: 2001:43f8:1d0::/48
> > netname: WACREN-v6
> >
> > frank at SNET-SNH-DC-P1> show route table inet6.0 2001:43f8:1d0::/48
> >
> > frank at SNET-SNH-DC-P1>
> >
> > route-views6.routeviews.org> sh bgp ipv6 2001:43f8:1d0::/48
> > % Network not in table
> > route-views6.routeviews.org>
> >
> > sorry to bring facts into this discussion.
> >
>
> I am sure wacren has their own reasons as to why some of that v6 is not
> lit.
>
> But lets not use that as the basis to prove a point.
>
> Interesting, so when you are casting stones at the ARIN region for
> addresses you assume are not in use because they are not advertised, it is
> relevant, but when someone makes the exact same point in a way that
> reflects poorly on you, then it becomes something that should not be used
> to prove a point.
>
> This is a very interesting double standard you have brought to this
> discussion.
>
Hardly a double standard. Seems you are loosing track Owen. I brought up
the 34.36 /8s unadvertised in the ARIN region. 576+ million IPv4
addresses.
Frank is repeating himself and I have already said that we are to undergo
an AFRINIC review so nothing new to add.
FWIW, since some are thumping chests about IPv6 deployments, I am sure
Tamon and Brice can remember this - http://www.eko-konnect.org.
ng/news/unilag-turns-ipv6-after-afrinic-training. As an aside, a model I'd
recommend for AFRINIC training towards more v6 deployments.
This was in 2010 - 6 years ago. The university found having to tunnel
through HE for v6 Internet unsatisfactory and turned off the peering.
There are quite a few others like this.
-Omo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20161110/e20999e1/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list