Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Policy Proposal Update - IPv4 Soft Landing-bis

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Fri Aug 26 07:06:57 UTC 2016



On 26/Aug/16 08:49, Saul Stein wrote:

> Surely new companies are a better position to role our v6 natively?

In my experience offering service to many new ISP's each month, I'd say
only 5% of them are interested in IPv6, and out of that, only 0.5%
actually deploy it.

That said, I don't think they should be trampled over simply because
they are new and/or small. I just think this thread needs to look at all
angles.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160826/cc73c163/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list