Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Selecting WG Co-Chairs: Was Re: Can a Consensual Decision of the PDWG Violate the PDP? (was: Report from Recall Committee)

Daniel Yakmut yakmutd at googlemail.com
Fri Feb 26 05:56:33 UTC 2021


Dear All,
I thought we were converging at a point. I am a bit thrown off with the
claim that we are not making any progress, as been espouse by Alain.

I am of the strong opinion that the Secretariat has made an attempt to
summarize our rantings into some cohesive plan. Therefore, I suggest we
work with this summary.

Particular item 1 clearly, will bring us out of the woods. I am hoping to a
see a Nomcom in the next few days calling for nominations and making
efforts at organising an election.

This we can achieve within a period of 4 to 6 weeks. The community should
rally around the Secretariat to achieve the right thing. We should not
encourage anyone to do otherwise.

Cheers
Daniel


On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, 3:16 PM ALAIN AINA via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In the past when the policy development process faced unforeseen
> situations in appointing moderators group or co-cochairs, board has stepped
> in and appointed interims.
>
> These appointments even included community consensus led by board chair.
>
> In 2008
>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2008/000575.html
>
> In 2010
>
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2010/001177.html
>
> Board has the ultimate and fiduciary responsibilities  in making sure the
> RIR fulfill its role and in the best way...
>
> I would encourage board to act as it is clearer that the WG is unable to
> self-organize at this point.
>
> We have a bunch of experienced and trusted people, who have served in
> different role or are known to be capable.
>
>
> -Alain
>
> > On 21 Feb 2021, at 10:26, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi SM,
> >
> > No, my question is not about the CPM/PDP text. I think it is clear for
> everybody the distinction there between "AFRINIC organization/membership"
> vs "AFRINIC community/PDWG".
> >
> > My question is about the Board interpretation of the Article 11.4 of the
> bylaws. Is the Board understanding that they can (in urgent situations,
> such as the one we are facing) adopt policies only related to Resources or
> also policies that not being related to resources but modifying the PDP?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jordi
> > @jordipalet
> >
> >
> >
> > El 21/2/21 11:10, "S. Moonesamy" <sm+af at afrinic.net> escribió:
> >
> >    Dear Mr Palet,
> >    At 12:28 AM 21-02-2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via board wrote:
> >> I've asked the board (copied again, because we didn't get a
> >> response), to confirm if their interpretation of Article 11.4 will
> >> allow that. Can the Board please confirm?
> >
> >    There is the following in the Policy Development Process: "Internet
> >    number resource policies are distinctly separate from AfriNIC general
> >    business practices and procedures. General business practices and
> >    procedures are not within the purview of the Policy Development
> >    Process."  Was your question related to Internet number resource
> policies?
> >
> >    Regards,
> >    S. Moonesamy
> >
> >    Board Chair, AFRINIC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************
> > IPv4 is over
> > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > http://www.theipv6company.com
> > The IPv6 Company
> >
> > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210226/27c4d5a3/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list