Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs
silber.mike at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 06:38:37 UTC 2021
I think that is an excellent list.
The only thing I would add to your point 5 is an intangible quality - a
history (or perception) of building consensus. Some of us understand RFC
7282, but because of our passion, style or language are less successful (or
perceived as less successful) at moving the group towards consensus.
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 07:54, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
> Hi PDWG participants,
> Could we as a WG participants agree on a set of criteria for a WG
> participant to become a co-chair.
> This I believe is more important and I had shared some few ideas below a
> separate thread but I think it would make sense to work this out on this
> new thread.
> Some thoughts that crossed my mind as criteria;
> 1. Active participation in WG discussions by a participant, in say, the
> past 3 years.
> 2. Participant should demonstrate a clear understanding of the CPM and
> especially sections that relate to the PDWG.
> 3. Participant should have some 5 years sound technical experience in this
> space with a clear understanding of Internet Protocol and preferably having
> worked in this space.
> 4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource members could
> come in handy for a participant interested in chairing policy discussions.
> 5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and consensus is all
> about, after all consensus is a path and not a destination. This is very
> Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what criteria are
> more required and which ones to discard to keep it simple.
> I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation to first
> sort this requirements out before we can think of the selection of the
> interim co-chairs.
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD