[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs

[Sunday Folayan]

I am OK with Noah's trajectory, proposition, and Mike's modification.

Slight edit in 4. "which is am AFRINIC resource members" should read 
"who is an AFRINIC resource member"

I also think we should add ...

6. Ability to remain calm in the face of provocation and respect for the 
continental diversity.

Sunday.

On 2/19/21 7:38 AM, Mike Silber wrote:

> Thanks Noah

>

> I think that is an excellent list.

>

> The only thing I would add to your point 5 is an intangible quality - 

> a history (or perception) of building consensus. Some of us understand 

> RFC 7282, but because of our passion, style or language are less 

> successful (or perceived as less successful) at moving the group 

> towards consensus.

>

> Regards

>

> Mike

>

> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 07:54, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz 

> <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:

>

>     Hi PDWG participants,

>

>     Could we as a WG participants agree on a set of criteria for a WG

>     participant to become a co-chair.

>

>     This I believe is more important and I had shared some few ideas

>     below a separate thread but I think it would make sense to work

>     this out on this new thread.

>

>     Some thoughts that crossed my mind as criteria;

>

>     1. Active participation in WG discussions by a participant, in

>     say, the past 3 years.

>

>     2. Participant should demonstrate a clear understanding of the CPM

>     and especially sections that relate to the PDWG.

>

>     3. Participant should have some 5 years sound technical experience

>     in this space with a clear understanding of Internet Protocol and

>     preferably having worked in this space.

>

>     4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource members

>     could come in handy for a participant interested in chairing

>     policy discussions.

>

>     5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and consensus

>     is all about, after all consensus is a path and not a destination.

>     This is very important.

>

>     Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what

>     criteria are more required and which ones to discard to keep it

>     simple.

>

>     I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation

>     to first sort this requirements out before we can think of the

>     selection of the interim co-chairs.

>

>     Cheers

>     Noah

>     _______________________________________________

>     RPD mailing list

>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/915bc013/attachment-0001.html>