[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs

[Sunday Folayan]

I am OK with Noah's trajectory, proposition, and Mike's modification.

Slight edit in 4. "which is am AFRINIC resource members" should read 
"who is an AFRINIC resource member"

I also think we should add ...

6. Ability to remain calm in the face of provocation and respect for the 
continental diversity.

Sunday.

On 2/19/21 7:38 AM, Mike Silber wrote:
> Thanks Noah
>
> I think that is an excellent list.
>
> The only thing I would add to your point 5 is an intangible quality - 
> a history (or perception) of building consensus. Some of us understand 
> RFC 7282, but because of our passion, style or language are less 
> successful (or perceived as less successful) at moving the group 
> towards consensus.
>
> Regards
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 07:54, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz 
> <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:
>
>     Hi PDWG participants,
>
>     Could we as a WG participants agree on a set of criteria for a WG
>     participant to become a co-chair.
>
>     This I believe is more important and I had shared some few ideas
>     below a separate thread but I think it would make sense to work
>     this out on this new thread.
>
>     Some thoughts that crossed my mind as criteria;
>
>     1. Active participation in WG discussions by a participant, in
>     say, the past 3 years.
>
>     2. Participant should demonstrate a clear understanding of the CPM
>     and especially sections that relate to the PDWG.
>
>     3. Participant should have some 5 years sound technical experience
>     in this space with a clear understanding of Internet Protocol and
>     preferably having worked in this space.
>
>     4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource members
>     could come in handy for a participant interested in chairing
>     policy discussions.
>
>     5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and consensus
>     is all about, after all consensus is a path and not a destination.
>     This is very important.
>
>     Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what
>     criteria are more required and which ones to discard to keep it
>     simple.
>
>     I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation
>     to first sort this requirements out before we can think of the
>     selection of the interim co-chairs.
>
>     Cheers
>     Noah
>     _______________________________________________
>     RPD mailing list
>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/915bc013/attachment.html>