Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs
sfolayan at skannet.com
Fri Feb 19 07:47:54 UTC 2021
I am OK with Noah's trajectory, proposition, and Mike's modification.
Slight edit in 4. "which is am AFRINIC resource members" should read
"who is an AFRINIC resource member"
I also think we should add ...
6. Ability to remain calm in the face of provocation and respect for the
On 2/19/21 7:38 AM, Mike Silber wrote:
> Thanks Noah
> I think that is an excellent list.
> The only thing I would add to your point 5 is an intangible quality -
> a history (or perception) of building consensus. Some of us understand
> RFC 7282, but because of our passion, style or language are less
> successful (or perceived as less successful) at moving the group
> towards consensus.
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 07:54, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz
> <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:
> Hi PDWG participants,
> Could we as a WG participants agree on a set of criteria for a WG
> participant to become a co-chair.
> This I believe is more important and I had shared some few ideas
> below a separate thread but I think it would make sense to work
> this out on this new thread.
> Some thoughts that crossed my mind as criteria;
> 1. Active participation in WG discussions by a participant, in
> say, the past 3 years.
> 2. Participant should demonstrate a clear understanding of the CPM
> and especially sections that relate to the PDWG.
> 3. Participant should have some 5 years sound technical experience
> in this space with a clear understanding of Internet Protocol and
> preferably having worked in this space.
> 4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource members
> could come in handy for a participant interested in chairing
> policy discussions.
> 5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and consensus
> is all about, after all consensus is a path and not a destination.
> This is very important.
> Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what
> criteria are more required and which ones to discard to keep it
> I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation
> to first sort this requirements out before we can think of the
> selection of the interim co-chairs.
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD