[rpd] Missing ratification request documents

[Ibeanusi Elvis]

Hello community, 

I see no issues with suggestions that Owen pointed out, which I am in support of. To settle the matter once and for all, I see no other option than for the co-chairs to resend the email to both the RPD list and the board so that we can all move forward from this, including setting a new clean state the next co-chairs to do their job as well. 

Elvis.


> On Feb 16, 2021, at 22:22, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:

> 

> Owen,

> 

> 1st: How would the cochairs send a WG discussions report and ratification request to board without Cc’ing the rpd list?

> 

> This constitutes a clear violation of the transparency  principle and long standing practices of the WG...( report to board always made public)

> 

> 2nd: how come board would not have received a mail sent by cochairs?

> 

> And you are now asking  former cochairs  to resend the report and copied the list?

> 

> Did you forget the saga of the said inter-transfer policy, the staff analysis on the board prerogatives?

> 

> Forgot the legal advice on the matter? 

> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/012121.html <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/012121.html>

> 

> May this convince those who are still hesitant to see some of your bad motives and connivance as you never supported that the “vaporware” to become a vibrant RIR for a continent of great people.

> 

> --

> Arnaud 

> 

> Le mar. 16 févr. 2021 à 12:08, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> a écrit :

> 

> 

>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 03:39 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:50 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:

>> Such as?

>> 

>> An email was sent. (to the best of my knowledge, having no reason to disbelieve claims from the co-chairs)

>> 

>> It apparently was not received by the board.

>> 

>> How does sending it again violate process?

>> 

>> The bottom up PDP is open and transparent..... go figure.

>> 

>> Noah

>>  

> 

> That doesn’t answer the question… Are you claiming that resending the previous email would somehow not be open or transparent?

> 

> I fail to see how you can make that case, especially if the former co-chairs copy this list as I requested. Seems to me that would be

> entirely open, transparent, and compliant with the process as defined in the PDP and CPM.

> 

> If you think otherwise, you’re going to need to present a better case than some trump-style assertion without details or relevance.

> 

> Owen

> 

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210216/2738a716/attachment-0001.html>