Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Missing ratification request documents

Arnaud AMELINA amelnaud at gmail.com
Tue Feb 16 13:22:00 UTC 2021


Owen,

1st: How would the cochairs send a WG discussions report and ratification
request to board without Cc’ing the rpd list?

This constitutes a clear violation of the transparency principle and long
standing practices of the WG...( report to board always made public)

2nd: how come board would not have received a mail sent by cochairs?

And you are now asking former cochairs to resend the report and copied
the list?

Did you forget the saga of the said inter-transfer policy, the staff
analysis on the board prerogatives?

Forgot the legal advice on the matter?
https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/012121.html

May this convince those who are still hesitant to see some of your bad
motives and connivance as you never supported that the “vaporware” to
become a vibrant RIR for a continent of great people.

--
Arnaud

Le mar. 16 févr. 2021 à 12:08, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> a écrit :


>

>

> On Feb 16, 2021, at 03:39 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>

>

>

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:50 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>

>> Such as?

>>

>> An email was sent. (to the best of my knowledge, having no reason to

>> disbelieve claims from the co-chairs)

>>

>> It apparently was not received by the board.

>>

>> How does sending it again violate process?

>>

>

> The bottom up PDP is open and transparent..... go figure.

>

> Noah

>

>

>

> That doesn’t answer the question… Are you claiming that resending the

> previous email would somehow not be open or transparent?

>

> I fail to see how you can make that case, especially if the former

> co-chairs copy this list as I requested. Seems to me that would be

> entirely open, transparent, and compliant with the process as defined in

> the PDP and CPM.

>

> If you think otherwise, you’re going to need to present a better case than

> some trump-style assertion without details or relevance.

>

> Owen

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210216/5d6e5178/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list