<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hello community, <div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I see no issues with suggestions that Owen pointed out, which I am in support of. To settle the matter once and for all, I see no other option than for the co-chairs to resend the email to both the RPD list and the board so that we can all move forward from this, including setting a new clean state the next co-chairs to do their job as well. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Elvis.<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 16, 2021, at 22:22, Arnaud AMELINA <<a href="mailto:amelnaud@gmail.com" class="">amelnaud@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div dir="auto" class="">Owen,</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">1st: How would the cochairs send a WG discussions report and ratification request to board without Cc’ing the rpd list?</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">This constitutes a clear violation of the transparency principle and long standing practices of the WG...( report to board always made public)</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">2nd: how come board would not have received a mail sent by cochairs?</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">And you are now asking former cochairs to resend the report and copied the list?</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Did you forget the saga of the said inter-transfer policy, the staff analysis on the board prerogatives?</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Forgot the legal advice on the matter? </div><div dir="auto" class=""><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/012121.html" class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/012121.html</a></div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">May this convince those who are still hesitant to see some of your bad motives and connivance as you never supported that the “vaporware” to become a vibrant RIR for a continent of great people.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">--</div><div dir="auto" class="">Arnaud </div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mar. 16 févr. 2021 à 12:08, Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" class="">owen@delong.com</a>> a écrit :<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space" class=""><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 16, 2021, at 03:39 , Noah <<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">noah@neo.co.tz</a>> wrote:</div><br class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:50 PM Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">owen@delong.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="">Such as?<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">An email was sent. (to the best of my knowledge, having no reason to disbelieve claims from the co-chairs)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">It apparently was not received by the board.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">How does sending it again violate process?</div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The bottom up PDP is open and transparent..... go figure.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Noah</div><div class=""> </div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">That doesn’t answer the question… Are you claiming that resending the previous email would somehow not be open or transparent?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I fail to see how you can make that case, especially if the former co-chairs copy this list as I requested. Seems to me that would be</div><div class="">entirely open, transparent, and compliant with the process as defined in the PDP and CPM.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">If you think otherwise, you’re going to need to present a better case than some trump-style assertion without details or relevance.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Owen</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">
RPD mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br class="">
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>