Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Missing ratification request documents
owen at delong.com
Tue Feb 16 12:07:48 UTC 2021
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 03:39 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 1:50 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
> Such as?
> An email was sent. (to the best of my knowledge, having no reason to disbelieve claims from the co-chairs)
> It apparently was not received by the board.
> How does sending it again violate process?
> The bottom up PDP is open and transparent..... go figure.
That doesn’t answer the question… Are you claiming that resending the previous email would somehow not be open or transparent?
I fail to see how you can make that case, especially if the former co-chairs copy this list as I requested. Seems to me that would be
entirely open, transparent, and compliant with the process as defined in the PDP and CPM.
If you think otherwise, you’re going to need to present a better case than some trump-style assertion without details or relevance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD