[rpd] TIMELINE FOR PROCESSING OF APPEALS

[Fernando Frediani]

To add up to this at the time the appeal Gregoire who was the person who 
submitted it answered a question from Dr Paulos B Nyirenda, member of 
the Appeal Committee with the following message bellow which was 
confirmed by Dr Paulos afterwards.

================================

Hi Paulos,

At the date of our appeal, the proposal had no reference attributed by 
the staff, it still presented the reference of version 3 of the draft, 
on Afrinic website.

Here is the reference of the last draft4 ID AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04, 
published on the website as of today. Of course the staff will be able 
to confirm all this.

Thank you,

--
Gregoire Ehoumi

================================

In any way, I hope regardless of the version the Appeal Committee 
analyses the decisions taken by the Co-Chairs.


Regards
Fernando

On 12/11/2020 09:57, Fernando Frediani wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I wanted to make an important note that perhaps may causing some 
> confusing and it is important make it clear for all. This has been 
> already said during the submit of the appeal but it seems it was 
> dismissed and there is a specific way either staff or Appeal Committee 
> wishes to read the CPM.
>
> Appeals are _against a Co-Chair decision_ as per CPM 3.5.1 where it 
> says: "/A person who *disagrees with the actions taken by the 
> Chair(s)* shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the 
> PDWG. If the disagreement cannot be resolved in this way, the person 
> may file an appeal with an Appeal Committee appointed by the AFRINIC 
> Board of Directors./"
>
> The appeal is against Co-Chais decision of declaration of consensus of 
> this Resource Transfer Policy.
> As everybody knows there was quiet a bit of confusion while the 
> proposal was in one specific version, which is when they declared the 
> consensus, then after there have been "editorial changes" which even 
> took time to be published on Afrinic website and the same happened 
> afterwards for another version.
>
> Appeal Committee shall not analyze the text of the proposal or its 
> merit, but if the decisions taken by the Chairs regarding a proposal 
> followed the CPM or not, so the version of the proposal doesn't really 
> matter, but the decision taken by the Co-Chairs at some point in time.
> I hope this make sense for people supporting this appeal and that 
> Appeal Committee can focus on analyzing if Co-Chais decisions violated 
> CPM or not.
>
> Thanks
> Fernando
>
> On 12/11/2020 08:30, wafa Dahmani wrote:
>> Dear Community,
>>
>> This is to inform you  that the appeal committee has published the 
>> timeline for processing on appeals :
>>  1. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2018-GEN-001-DRAFT06 (Abuse Contact Policy 
>> Update – Draft 6)
>> 2. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT02 (RPKI ROAs for 
>> Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space – Draft 2)
>> 3. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2020-GEN-001-DRAFT01 (Policy Compliance 
>> Dashboard – Draft 1)
>> 4. Consensus on AFPUB-2019-GEN-002-DRAFT02 (Resource Transfer Policy)
>> 5. Consensus on AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer Policy)
>>
>> under the following link:
>>
>> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeals_timeline_20201112.pdf 
>> <https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeals_timeline_20201112.pdf>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Wafa Dahmani
>> Chair of the Appeal committee
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201112/3e750e34/attachment.html>