[rpd] TIMELINE FOR PROCESSING OF APPEALS

[Gregoire EHOUMI]

Hello,

My understanding of what is expected of the Appeal committee is to judge whether or not the PDP has been followed.

According to CPM section 3.5.2

#####
The appeal must be submitted within two weeks of the public knowledge of the decision. The Appeal Committee shall issue a report on its review of the complaint to the Working Group. The Appeal Committee may direct that the Chair(s) decision be annulled if the Policy Development Process has not been followed.
#####

Thanks 
Gregoire Ehoumi


> On Nov 12, 2020, at 7:57 AM, Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:

> 

> Hello

> 

> I wanted to make an important note that perhaps may causing some confusing and it is important make it clear for all. This has been already said during the submit of the appeal but it seems it was dismissed and there is a specific way either staff or Appeal Committee wishes to read the CPM.

> 

> Appeals are against a Co-Chair decision as per CPM 3.5.1 where it says: "A person who disagrees with the actions taken by the Chair(s) shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the PDWG. If the disagreement cannot be resolved in this way, the person may file an appeal with an Appeal Committee appointed by the AFRINIC Board of Directors."

> 

> The appeal is against Co-Chais decision of declaration of consensus of this Resource Transfer Policy.

> As everybody knows there was quiet a bit of confusion while the proposal was in one specific version, which is when they declared the consensus, then after there have been "editorial changes" which even took time to be published on Afrinic website and the same happened afterwards for another version.

> 

> Appeal Committee shall not analyze the text of the proposal or its merit, but if the decisions taken by the Chairs regarding a proposal followed the CPM or not, so the version of the proposal doesn't really matter, but the decision taken by the Co-Chairs at some point in time.

> I hope this make sense for people supporting this appeal and that Appeal Committee can focus on analyzing if Co-Chais decisions violated CPM or not.

> 

> Thanks

> Fernando

> 

> On 12/11/2020 08:30, wafa Dahmani wrote:

>> Dear Community,

>> 

>> This is to inform you  that the appeal committee has published the timeline for processing on appeals :

>>  1. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2018-GEN-001-DRAFT06 (Abuse Contact Policy Update – Draft 6) 

>> 2. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT02 (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space – Draft 2) 

>> 3. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2020-GEN-001-DRAFT01 (Policy Compliance Dashboard – Draft 1)

>> 4. Consensus on AFPUB-2019-GEN-002-DRAFT02 (Resource Transfer Policy) 

>> 5. Consensus on AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer Policy)  

>> 

>> under the following link:

>> 

>> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeals_timeline_20201112.pdf <https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeals_timeline_20201112.pdf> 

>> 

>> Best Regards

>> Wafa Dahmani

>> Chair of the Appeal committee

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201117/4144f121/attachment.html>