<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>To add up to this at the time the appeal Gregoire who was the
      person who submitted it answered a question from Dr Paulos B
      Nyirenda, member of the Appeal Committee with the following
      message bellow which was confirmed by Dr Paulos afterwards.<br>
    </p>
    <p>================================<br>
    </p>
    <p><span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px;"
        align="left">
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">Hi Paulos,</span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">At the date of our appeal, the
              proposal had no reference attributed by the staff, it
              still presented the reference of version 3 of the draft,
              on Afrinic website. </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">Here is the reference of the last
              draft4 ID AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04, published on the
              website as of today. Of course the staff will be able to
              confirm all this. </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">Thank you,</span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">--</span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">Gregoire Ehoumi</span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;">================================</span></font></div>
        <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
              style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
            </span></font></div>
      </span></p>
    <p><span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px;"
        align="left">
        <div align="left"><font size="+1">In any way, I hope regardless
            of the version the Appeal Committee analyses the decisions
            taken by the Co-Chairs.<br>
          </font></div>
      </span></p>
    <span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 12.8px;"
      align="left">
      <div align="left"><font size="+1" face="Arial"><span
            style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
          </span></font></div>
      <div align="left"><font size="+1" face="Arial"><span
            style="font-size: 10pt;">Regards<br>
            Fernando</span></font></div>
      <div align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial"><span
            style="font-size: 10pt;"><br>
          </span></font></div>
    </span>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/11/2020 09:57, Fernando Frediani
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:39d607e1-dfb9-de51-2304-921969dd1fe4@gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p>Hello</p>
      <p>I wanted to make an important note that perhaps may causing
        some confusing and it is important make it clear for all. This
        has been already said during the submit of the appeal but it
        seems it was dismissed and there is a specific way either staff
        or Appeal Committee wishes to read the CPM.</p>
      <p>Appeals are <u>against a Co-Chair decision</u> as per CPM
        3.5.1 where it says: "<i>A person who <b>disagrees with the
            actions taken by the Chair(s)</b> shall discuss the matter
          with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the PDWG. If the disagreement
          cannot be resolved in this way, the person may file an appeal
          with an Appeal Committee appointed by the AFRINIC Board of
          Directors.</i>"</p>
      <p>The appeal is against Co-Chais decision of declaration of
        consensus of this Resource Transfer Policy.<br>
        As everybody knows there was quiet a bit of confusion while the
        proposal was in one specific version, which is when they
        declared the consensus, then after there have been "editorial
        changes" which even took time to be published on Afrinic website
        and the same happened afterwards for another version.<br>
        <br>
        Appeal Committee shall not analyze the text of the proposal or
        its merit, but if the decisions taken by the Chairs regarding a
        proposal followed the CPM or not, so the version of the proposal
        doesn't really matter, but the decision taken by the Co-Chairs
        at some point in time.<br>
        I hope this make sense for people supporting this appeal and
        that Appeal Committee can focus on analyzing if Co-Chais
        decisions violated CPM or not.<br>
      </p>
      <p>Thanks<br>
        Fernando<br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/11/2020 08:30, wafa Dahmani
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJ390S_Qk-nt9E-DAbxnZze6g-ng1ZVHD-3=6DNZcAMpkZGnTQ@mail.gmail.com">
        <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <div dir="ltr">Dear Community,
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>This is to inform you  that the appeal committee has
            published the timeline for processing on appeals :</div>
          <div> 1. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2018-GEN-001-DRAFT06 (Abuse
            Contact Policy Update – Draft 6) </div>
          <div>2. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT02 (RPKI ROAs
            for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space – Draft
            2) </div>
          <div>3. Non-consensus on AFPUB-2020-GEN-001-DRAFT01 (Policy
            Compliance Dashboard – Draft 1)</div>
          <div>4. Consensus on AFPUB-2019-GEN-002-DRAFT02 (Resource
            Transfer Policy) </div>
          <div>5. Consensus on AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource
            Transfer Policy)  <br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>under the following link:</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><a
              href="https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeals_timeline_20201112.pdf"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/policy/appeals_timeline_20201112.pdf</a> <br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Best Regards</div>
          <div>Wafa Dahmani</div>
          <div>Chair of the Appeal committee</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>