Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Two more petitioners

Noah noah at
Thu Dec 21 10:33:53 UTC 2017

On 21 Dec 2017 10:37, "Mark Elkins" <mje at> wrote:

We really need to "eat" the existing IPv4 up quickly (in a responsible way,
using the current policy) in order to leave no alternative except IPv6
deployment. Then, everybody wins.

If we did what you have suggested above, we would end up starving so bad
and while starving, the IPv$ brokers would swing in so fast and dictate the
price of the readily available yet  much needed IPv4 space.

Service delivery to the end user we love so much would become so expensive
in order to recover the cost.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list