[rpd] [Board-Discuss] RPD appeal committee

Wed Jul 12 14:57:03 UTC 2017

This is an interesting conversation here.

Why? Because if I think things through and decide on the last day of that
period that I have intent to file - and then inform the board - the
committee will not be constituted in time for the appeal to reach them in
the stipulated time period - where as had I sent directly to a standing
committee it would have.

I do agree with Andrew here.

So - is the board prepared to commit to appointing a committee within 6
hours notice? Anything else would prejudice the rights as stipulated in the
CPM

I do agree with this as well. Apologize again if i missed something, can
anyone please explain to me why the Board cannot nominate a standing
committee? A committee whith whom community members would file their
complaints directly, bearing in mind that the Board might not (in some
circumstances) have enough time to do it, should the request to form the
committee comes in close to the expiration of the 2 weeks time? If it is
because that's what the CPM say, can't we change them?

Alan said the following later on:
No, the policy process does not say that the Board must appoint the
committee long in advance to be on standby in case there’s an appeal.  The
policy process is silent about when the committee gets appointed.

Maybe it is the time to change it now that someone raised the issue and
presented some good motivations about it? How can we go about this?

------------------------
**Arsène Tungali* <http://about.me/ArseneTungali>*
Co-Founder & Executive Director, *Rudi international
<http://www.rudiinternational.org>*,
CEO,* Smart Services Sarl <http://www.smart-serv.info>*, *Mabingwa Forum
<http://www.mabingwa-forum.com>*
Tel: +243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
*Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo*

2015 Mandela Washington Felllow
<http://tungali.blogspot.com/2015/06/selected-for-2015-mandela-washington.html>
(YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil
<http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/igf-ambassadors-programme/Past-Ambassadors>
& Mexico
<http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/education-and-leadership-programmes/next-generation-leaders/Current-Ambassadors>)
- AFRISIG 2016 <http://afrisig.org/afrisig-2016/class-of-2016/> - Blogger
<http://tungali.blogspot.com> - ICANN Fellow (Los Angeles
<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-07-18-en> & Marrakech
<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/marrakech55-attendees-2016-03-14-en>
). AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius
<http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/news/1907-afrinic-25-fellowship-winners>)*
- *IGFSA Member <http://www.igfsa.org/> - Internet Governance - Internet
Freedom.

Check the *2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC* report (English
<http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=234>) and (French
<http://cipesa.org/?wpfb_dl=242>)

2017-07-12 9:45 GMT+02:00 Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>:

> Oh and sorry - another point - the appeal process says I have to file with
> the committee within 2 weeks of the alleged incident - if I have to submit
> via the board first - this changes the stipulated time frames and makes
> them much shorter.
>
> Why? Because if I think things through and decide on the last day of that
> period that I have intent to file - and then inform the board - the
> committee will not be constituted in time for the appeal to reach them in
> the stipulated time period - where as had I sent directly to a standing
> committee it would have.
>
> So - is the board prepared to commit to appointing a committee within 6
> hours notice? Anything else would prejudice the rights as stipulated in the
> CPM
>
> Andrew
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:37:54 AM
>
> *To:* Alan Barrett; AfriNIC RPD MList.
> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] [Board-Discuss] RPD appeal committee
>
> Alan - further to this -
>
> You said if I want it - ask for it - sorry to say this but that is simply
> not valid - the community asked for it - when they approved the current PDP
> - I should not have to ask for it - it should be there - and I take partial
> responsibility as an ex board member for missing this and not insisting on
> it during my time on the board - it was an oversight and I apologize to the
> community for that
>
> Andrew
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:28:42 AM
> *To:* Alan Barrett; AfriNIC RPD MList.
> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] [Board-Discuss] RPD appeal committee
>
> Alan - it is required - the CPM (not the bylaws) require it as the
> community agreed to that CPM.
>
> The problem you have with complaints being diverted via the board is as
> follows:
>
> A.) it is well established practice - that I fully support - that board
> members may partake in their personal capacity in PDP meetings and the PDP
> process
> B.) it is established fact that at points staff - including yourself -
> have expressed opinions on certain aspects (see Mauritius) - again - I
> fully support that - but it creates conflict
> C.) The CPM says appeals must be filed within 2 weeks - I believe the
> intention on this is to ensure that information is clear and retained - and
> the delays by having the board constitute adhoc committees could have a
> detrimental affect on the process
> D.) the process says nothing about submitting the complaint to anyone
> other than the committee - that cannot be done without the committee
> existing
> E.) do I believe there is a need for such a committee? 100% - if such a
> committee existed and I had known it - I would have already appealed the
> decision to pass the review policy to last call - on substantial grounds.
>
> So yes - that committee is mandated by the CPM - yes it is necessary - yes
> I want the ability as promised in the CPM to file my appeals directly with
> the committee - yes I do not believe the board should have any part in said
> committee outside of appointing it - and certainly should not appoint
> themselves as gateway to the committee when the CPM in no way caters for
> such a scenario
>
> Again I ask - if I am told to file with the appeal committee - how do I do
> that without it existing - am I forced to push said appeal through the
> board - in which case please show me the sections of the CPM and the bylaws
> that allow the board to insert itself into this process
>
> Andrew
>
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:10:15 AM
> *To:* AfriNIC RPD MList.
> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] [Board-Discuss] RPD appeal committee
>
>
> > On 12 Jul 2017, at 10:50, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry Alan - but this is in direct conflict with what the CPM says, I
> quote:
> >
> >> if the disagreement cannot be resolved in this way, the person may file
> an appeal with an Appeal Committee appointed by the AFRINIC Board of
> Directors.
> >
> > It is impossible to file an appeal if there is no committee to file it
> with - and nowhere does this process give the board the right to decide
> when such a committee is necessary.
> >
> > Indeed as I have stated in my previous email - the board is conflicted
> as they have to ratify - and the right of community members to file appeals
> independent of the board must be respected - and that dictates that there
> be a sitting committee with whom to file said appeals
>
> I don’t see the conflict that you claim. That sentence does not say when
> the committee needs to be appointed. My interpretation, shared by Afrinic’s
> legal advisor, is that the committee may be appointed at the time that it
> becomes necessary.
>
> One possible process would be: a complainant informs the Baord of intent
> to file an appeal; the Board appoints an appeal committee; the complainant
> files an appeal with the appeal committee.
>
> If you would like the appeal committee to be appointed even when there are
> no pending appeals, then I suggest that you ask for that, and give reasons.
> Please make it a discussion about whether or not a standing committee is a
> good idea, rather than whether or not the bylaws require it.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170712/54411ebe/attachment-0001.html>