[rpd] Summary of proposals: IPv4 Runout Management

[Arnaud AMELINA]

Huuuum ! Mr Alston,

How are the “valid and sustained objections” shown in the video ? lack of
“rough consensus” is not determined by  number of objections, nor by number
of support.

Regards

Arnaud

Le 8 nov. 2016 19:36, "Andrew Alston" <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com> a
écrit :

> Christian,
>
>
>
> Position 4:09:50 in the recording of Gaborone June 8th 2016 as found at
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR6UNQnrqcs
>
>
>
> I quote – “Thanks authors – so we did not declare consensus on this policy
> proposal and it will be back to the mailing list for further discussion and
> maybe amendment”
>
>
>
> I also strongly suggest you look at the consensus call on the floor itself
> in the show of hands – which is not a vote but it is an indicator.  While
> they do not show in the video the hands of those who said supported with
> amendment – they do show the show of hands for those completely opposed,
> and there were a fair number of them.
>
>
>
> Since consensus is defined by a lack of valid and sustained objection,
> consensus was clearly NOT reached on the floor.
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> *From:* Bope Domilongo Christian [mailto:christianbope at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 08 November 2016 19:54
> *To:* Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy <rpd at afrinic.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Summary of proposals: IPv4 Runout Management
>
>
>
> +1
>
> Indeed the community at large reach a rough consensus at Gabarone,
> Botswana and recommend minor update which have been incorporated by the
> authors. This is the time for the P-co Chair to call for the rough
> consensus.
>
> [speaking on my own capacity]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20161109/fa9a3a85/attachment.html>