[rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18

[abel ELITCHA]

 2014         2015                         2016

"/11” (0.000%)       0 ( 50.064%)         4 (43.612%)        1
"/12"       (61.692%)       7        (6.258%0         1 (43.612%)        2
“/13" ( 17.626%)       4       (12.516%)         4 (0.000%) 0
“/14" ( 8.813%)       4       (17.210%)        11 (0.000%) 0
“/15" (4.407%) 4 (3.129%) 4 (0.000%) 0
"/16"        (1.652%) 3 (4.694%) 12 (6.814%) 5
“/17" (1.928%) 7 (2.151%) 11 (2.044%) 3
“/18" (0.964%) 7 (1.565%) 16 (1.704%) 5
“/19" (1.102%) 16 (1.027%) 21 (1.022%) 6
“/20" (0.792%) 23 (0.587%) 24 (0.426%) 5
“/21” (0.310%) 18 (0.220%) 18 (0.383%) 9
“/22" (0.714%) 83 (0.581%) 95 (0.383%) 18
“/23" (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0
/“24" (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0


2014: 147 allocations of max /18 vs 29 allocations
2015: 174 ""              "" /18 vs 47  ""
2016: 43  ""              "" /18 vs  11 ""

As shown in the statistics of past 2 years and currently 2016; the majority
of requests of IPv4 allocations made by AFRINIC is largely covered by a*
/18.*
*So I'll support the amendement of Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT 02 as follow*:

3.5.1) Exhaustion Phase 1

During this phase, allocation/assignment of address space will continue as
in the Current phase with no explicit minimum but the maximum will change
from /10 to /18.
Allocations and assignments will be made from the Final /8 or from any
other IPv4 address space available to AFRINIC, until no more than a /11 of
non-reserved space is available in the Final /8.
At this point the exhaustion phase 2 will begin.
For the avoidance of doubt all applications will be in the process at this
point will be evaluated as per the new policy.


--Komi A. Elitcha

2016-06-22 10:26 GMT+00:00 Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>:

>
> On 16 Jun 2016 12:13, "Bope Domilongo Christian" <christianbope at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear authors,
> >
> > I would like to take this opportunity to follow up some amendment of
> Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02 proposal requested by the community during
> face-2-face meeting in Botswana.
> >
> > For those who was not present, I would  briefly explain the rational
> behind the amendment.
> >
> > Based on statistic presented:
> >
> >                  - 91.28 % or 1223/1340 AFRINIC members are small i.e
> maximum allocation /22
> >                  - 8.74 %    or 117/1340  AFRINIC members are medium and
> above
> >
> > Based on this data, we can clearly see that the maximum allocation for
> should be around /18 instead of /15 as presented in the policy in section,
> > 3.5.1) Exhaustion Phase 1
>
> Yeah, a  /18 sounds reasonable to me as a starter and i think the authors
> should consider that.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bope
> >
>
> Noah
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>


-- 
Best regards,

--Komi A. Elitcha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160623/8186ff66/attachment-0001.html>