Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18

Serge Ilunga sergekbk at yahoo.fr
Wed Jun 22 11:11:04 UTC 2016


+1 Noah, /18 is reasonable to start with.
Kind Regards.

Serge IlungaCell: +243814443160Skype: sergekbkR.D.Congo-------- Original message --------From: Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> Date: 06/22/2016  13:26  (GMT+03:00) To: Bope Domilongo Christian <christianbope at gmail.com> Cc: rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net> Subject: Re: [rpd] Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02-max allocation from/15 to /18 


On 16 Jun 2016 12:13, "Bope Domilongo Christian" <christianbope at gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Dear authors,

>

> I would like to take this opportunity to follow up some amendment of Soft Landing - BIS DRAFT-02 proposal requested by the community during face-2-face meeting in Botswana.

>

> For those who was not present, I would  briefly explain the rational behind the amendment.

>

> Based on statistic presented:

>

>                  - 91.28 % or 1223/1340 AFRINIC members are small i.e maximum allocation /22

>                  - 8.74 %    or 117/1340  AFRINIC members are medium and above

>  

> Based on this data, we can clearly see that the maximum allocation for should be around /18 instead of /15 as presented in the policy in section,  

> 3.5.1) Exhaustion Phase 1

Yeah, a  /18 sounds reasonable to me as a starter and i think the authors should consider that.
+1 for /18.
>

> Regards,

>

> Bope

>
Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160622/eecd079c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list