Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] New Proposal - "Internet Number Resources Audit by AFRINIC (AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01)

Mike Silber silber.mike at gmail.com
Sun May 29 09:38:32 UTC 2016


Hi Alain

You and I are in agreement on most issues, except:

> On 28 May 2016, at 14:55, ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Let not focus too much on how we handle reports and complaints. Staff will provide supporting documents on how they will implement.
> 
> Reasons for reports, documentations to be provided and affected resources and parties, shall tell staff what to do.

I do not believe that complainants (especially competitor complainants) have the right to "tell staff what to do". I believe they have the right to inform staff and staff - taking all factors into account - have the right to dismiss the complaints, ignore the complaint, conduct a preliminary review to determine if further action is required or embark on a full audit.

I have no problem with policy "telling staff what to do" however the current draft gives a complainant that right, which I do not believe is justifiable.

Mike

> 
> If the question is still "on which basis an organization would be reported by another ?”
> 
> Non-complance to policies and RSA basis coupled with information to establish evidences as listed at section 3.4.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> —Alain
> 
> 
>> On May 27, 2016, at 10:48 PM, Mike Silber <silber.mike at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Ornella
>> 
>> On 27 May 2016, at 17:53, Honest Ornella GANKPA <honest1989 at gmail.com> wrote
>>> I have one question however: on which basis an organization would be reported by another? 
>>> 
>> Excellent question! I would suggest that reporting should not automatically trigger an audit. Personally I would prefer to just confirm the audit right (which already exists, so this may be unnecessary but not really a problem to confirm it), and leave it to staff to determine if and when to invoke them.
>> 
>> Competitor complains are IMHO not a valid basis for an automatic audit and staff should be able to weed out valid complaints from attempts to disrupt.
>> 
>> Mike
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160529/20f93037/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list