[rpd] LACNIC has adopted Intra-RIR Transfers Policy and

Tue Apr 5 10:38:10 UTC 2016

Merci Serge pour cette info. Cela démontre qu’il faut être prudent nous aussi et adopter une politique qui soit au bénéfice de la région.

All, we support /15 !!

Patrick

NIC CI

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D071F4.5E155680]

[logo-artci-test]<http://www.artci.ci/>                                           www.artci.ci<http://www.artci.ci/>

  Serges Patrick GHANSAH-GNONKOTO
   Chef de service Gestion des Noms de domaine et Adresses IP
   Head of Service Domain names and IP addresses Management
    Chef du Projet de Mise en œuvre du plan national de déploiement de l’IPv6
   Head of Implementation Project of the national plan of IPv6 deployment
   Direction des Systèmes d’information et des Transactions Electroniques
   Téléphone : +225 20 34 43 73 / Poste 7960
   Mobile : +225 05 28 90 20
   Fax : +225 20 34 43 75
   Email : gnonkoto.patrick at artci.ci<mailto:gnonkoto.patrick at artci.ci> gnonkoto.patrick at nic.ci<mailto:gnonkoto.patrick at nic.ci> gnonkoto.patrick at testbedipv6.ci<mailto:gnonkoto.patrick at testbedipv6.ci>

-----Message d'origine-----
De : rpd-request at afrinic.net [mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net]
Envoyé : mardi 5 avril 2016 10:23
À : rpd at afrinic.net
Objet : RPD Digest, Vol 115, Issue 3

Send RPD mailing list submissions to

         rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

         rpd-request at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>

You can reach the person managing the list at

         rpd-owner at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. LACNIC has adopted Intra-RIR Transfers Policy and Rejected

      Inter-RIR transfers Policy (serge ilunga)

   2. Latest Allocation statistics (Andrew Alston)

   3. Re: RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5 (abel ELITCHA)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1

Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:01:53 +0100

From: serge ilunga <sergekbk at gmail.com<mailto:sergekbk at gmail.com>>

To: rpd <rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>

Subject: [rpd] LACNIC has adopted Intra-RIR Transfers Policy and

         Rejected Inter-RIR transfers Policy

Message-ID:

         <CAHm7s1SzHqODGVWECKDf3L9GQorx=fXegvb-_c8qH9eO+SLNzw at mail.gmail.com<mailto:CAHm7s1SzHqODGVWECKDf3L9GQorx=fXegvb-_c8qH9eO+SLNzw at mail.gmail.com>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Dear Community,

I would like to share with you the links below announcing that intra-RIR transfers have been adopted while Inter-RIR transfers have been rejected by LACNIC.

A new policy on intra-RIR transfers is now in force http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/anuncios/2016-nueva-politica-transferencias

IPv4 Inter-RIR transfers policy proposal abandoned in  2015 as in 2014 https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2015-2?language=en

https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2012-8?language=en

IPv4 RIR resources post exhaustion period is coming with  issues that need to be handled in a proper way. Discussions have been made on this list on this matter and some  opinions (Inter RIR , Intra RIR transfers and out of region transfer policy) have been expressed on this list.

As we can see, LACNIC has adopted policies preventing move of IPv4 resources out of region.

This fact corroborates the opinion saying that we can?t afford to sustain any policy that will make legal the move of IPv4 resources out of our region.

We are  a community driven organization and  our main objective is  to work for the growth of Internet in our region. For each decision and choice to be made  at the time being, we have to make sure that IPv4 resources needed to migrate to IPv6 will be available for the majority of our members (current, New and critical infrastructures).

Kind Regards.

--

*Serge ILUNGA KABWIKA*

*Skype: sergekbk*

*Cell: +243814443160*

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/a77862e2/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2

Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 06:34:32 +0000

From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com<mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>>

To: "rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>" <rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>

Subject: [rpd] Latest Allocation statistics

Message-ID:

         <AMSPR03MB534B456DE07FDFC67E19DD4EE9E0 at AMSPR03MB534.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com<mailto:AMSPR03MB534B456DE07FDFC67E19DD4EE9E0 at AMSPR03MB534.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Hi All,

Just for consideration as we move forward, and I will attempt if I remember to post these stats at the start of every month.

As per the latest delegation file published by AfriNIC:

Since the 1st of January to current date 0.2875 /8s have been allocated, this equates to 18845 /24s or 73.6133 /16s, or 4.824 million IP addresses.

The breakdown per month is as follows:

In January AfriNIC allocated 16889 /24s, which is 65.9727 /16s, or 0.2577 of a /8 In February AfriNIC allocated 293 /24s, which is 1.14453 /16s, or 0.0044 of a /8 In March AfriNIC allocated 1639 /24s, which is 6.402 /16s, or 0.025 of a /8 To date in April so far, 24 /24s have been allocated, which is 0.093 of a /16

Note: these are purely allocated figures and I have no information about what the hostmasters may or may not have in the queue.  Obviously if there are any large allocations still queued we could see months where these figures are way higher than other months.  (For example, if a /11 is queued and gets approved, the month it gets approved would show a bump of 8192 /24s)

Thanks

Andrew

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/be796e75/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3

Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:22:31 +0000

From: abel ELITCHA <kmw.elitcha at gmail.com<mailto:kmw.elitcha at gmail.com>>

To: "AfriNIC RPD MList." <rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>, rpd-request at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>

Subject: Re: [rpd] RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5

Message-ID:

         <CAN0q0kG2e=WibH7Bh++ZZ8g=fhHqwqnKg=kMCcOwQkyC98WdQg at mail.gmail.com<mailto:CAN0q0kG2e=WibH7Bh++ZZ8g=fhHqwqnKg=kMCcOwQkyC98WdQg at mail.gmail.com>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Bonjour,

Je supporte la proposition du /15.

Au vu des statistiques ci-dessous qui refl?tent les *allocations *d'adresses

IPv4 faites par AfriNic ces trois (3) derni?res ann?es, la limitation a probablement tout son sens.

2014           2015                       2016

"/11? (0.000%)        0 ( 50.064%) 4 (43.612%) 1

"/12" (61.692%) 7  (6.258%0 1 (43.612%) 2 ?/13" ( 17.626%) 4 (12.516%) 4 (0.000%) 0 ?/14" ( 8.813%) 4 (17.210%) 11 (0.000%) 0 ?/15" (4.407%) 4 (3.129%) 4 (0.000%) 0 "/16" (1.652%) 3 (4.694%) 12 (6.814%) 5 ?/17" (1.928%) 7 (2.151%) 11 (2.044%) 3 ?/18" (0.964%) 7 (1.565%) 16 (1.704%) 5 ?/19" (1.102%) 16 (1.027%) 21 (1.022%) 6 ?/20" (0.792%) 23 (0.587%) 24 (0.426%) 5 ?/21? (0.310%) 18 (0.220%) 18 (0.383%) 9 ?/22" (0.714%) 83 (0.581%) 95 (0.383%) 18 ?/23" (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 /?24" (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0

Cdt,

2016-03-31 17:59 GMT+00:00 gregoire.ehoumi <gregoire.ehoumi at yahoo.fr<mailto:gregoire.ehoumi at yahoo.fr>>:

> I'm ok with this resume, and support /15

>

> Best regards

>

> Gregoire EHOUMI

> -------- Original message --------

> From: rpd-request at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>

> Date: 2016-03-31 8:00 AM (GMT-05:00)

> To: rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

> Subject: RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5

>

> Send RPD mailing list submissions to

> rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

>

> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

> rpd-request at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>

>

> You can reach the person managing the list at rpd-owner at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>

>

> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."

>

>

> Today's Topics:

>

>    1. IPv4 Soft Landing-bis policy proposal discussions and

>       consensus (ALAIN AINA)

>

>

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> Message: 1

> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:07:40 +0400

> From: ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net<mailto:aalain at trstech.net>>

> To: AfriNIC List <rpd at afrinic.net<mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>

> Subject: [rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing-bis policy proposal discussions and

> consensus

> Message-ID: <461D004D-2818-4E2C-93C3-ECADD715645E at trstech.net<mailto:461D004D-2818-4E2C-93C3-ECADD715645E at trstech.net>>

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

>

> Hello RPD,

>

> Once again, the authors would like to thank the RPD list and the

> community for the discussions and suggestions we had  so far about the

> soft landing-bis policy proposal.

>

> We discussed:

>

> - The Maximum of allocation/assignment  size in exhaustion phase 1

>

> - The IPv6 clause linked to allocation  during the exhaustion.

>    LIR and End users requesting IPv4 must have IPv6 resources from

> AFRINIC (or request concomitantly with the IPv4) or from their upstreams.

>

> - Reserves for new comers and Critical Internet Infrastructures during

> phase 2

>

> - Limitation on number of allocations/assignment during the exhaustion

>

>

> Most of the contributions showed support  to the IPv6 clause and to

> the reserves for "new comers" and  "Critical Internet

> Infrastructures". Authors consider that we have reached a fair consensus on these points.

>

> Many contributions on the list suggested  that the maximum of

> allocation/assignment size be set to lower than /15. Many others were

> however of the opinion of the authors. Therefore, we believe that /15

> is a good compromise which serves  the best, the interest of the

> community at large.

>

> So  we call for consensus on the /15.

>

> We received many comments and queries on-list and off-list about

> limiting the number of additional requests from a member during phase

> 1. Phase 2 having provisions for new comers and critical Internet Infrastructures.

>

> Concerns were that considering the current rate of allocation, Phase 1

> may not last as expected.

>

> in 2014,AFRINIC issued  46,603 /24 IPv4 (11,930,368 IPs), 0.711105347

> /8 In 2015, AFRINIC issued 65,959 /24 IPv4 (16,885,504

> IPs),1.006454468 /8 in 2016 (30 March 2016), AFRINIC issued 18,820 /24

> IPv4 (4,817,920 IPs),

> 0.28717041 /8

>

> As said before, this policy proposal tries to stay in the spirit of

> "IPv4 Soft Landing Policy? which did not set limit of number of

> additional allocations/assignments  to a member during the exhaustion

> as our region is emerging and AFRINIC is the RIR which distributed

> the least  of IPV4. It just reduced the allocation/assignment period

> of 12 months to 8 months to only satisfy short and mid-term needs.

>

> To accommodate this request, we suggest the following change to the

> phase1 allocation criteria:

>

> Phase 1

>

> - Maximum allocation/assignment size is /15

> - There is no explicit limit on the number of times an organisation

> may request additional IPv4 address space, "but the total of

> allocation/assignment to a member shall not exceed /15?

>

> Phase 2

>

> No change

>

> We would like to hear the community views on this.

>

>

> Thanks

>

> ?Alain(on behalf of the Authors)

>

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: Digest Footer

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net<mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

> ------------------------------

>

> End of RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5

> ***********************************

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net<mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

--

*Meilleures salutations / Best wishes,*

*Komi M. Woat?ba ELITCHA*

BP/P.O. BOX: 8217 Lome -Togo

*Bureau/Office : 00228 98 58 89 02*

*Mobile : 00228 91 43 98 29*

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/142aa0e4/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________

RPD mailing list

RPD at afrinic.net<mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

------------------------------

End of RPD Digest, Vol 115, Issue 3

***********************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/a6a30a78/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1652 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/a6a30a78/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6921 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/a6a30a78/attachment-0001.png>