Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Proposal Update (was: Re: New Proposal - "Soft Landing - BIS (AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT-02)"

Omo Oaiya Omo.Oaiya at
Thu Feb 25 08:49:36 UTC 2016

On 21 February 2016 at 19:07, McTim <dogwallah at> wrote:

> All,
> I am generally supportive of this proposal, I think it is an improvement
> over current policy.
> I do question this sentence however:
> "There is no explicit limit on the number of times an organization may
> request additional IPv4 address space during Exhaustion Phase 1. "
> Why no limit?

Hello McTim,

...because like Alain mentions, we are staying with the spirit of existing
policies but addressing the issues not adequately catered for.

So, the goal is to make distribution fairer and keep critical
infrastructure running in the exhaustion phase but still let anyone get
resources if they need them and meet the allocation criteria.

Thanks for your support.
- Omo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list