[members-discuss] Re: [rpd] Privacy breach of nomcom2015's Mailing List

[Mark Elkins]

The gent who found the hole...
1 - considers that I have honor and integrity
2 - knows that I served last year as Chair of NomCom
3 - knows I have a technical background
4 - may know me better on a personal basis, better than most other Board Members
5 - knows I will do the right thing.

Perhaps there was nothing odd with his action at all?

   .  .        ___. .__      Posix Systems - (South) Africa.
 /| /|             / /__       mje at posix.co.za  -  Mark J Elkins, Cisco CCIE
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  Tel: +27 12 807 0590  Cell: +27 82 601 0496

> On 07 Jun 2015, at 12:19, Boubakar Barry <boubakarbarry at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The most odd thing in this is the sharing of the archives with _selected_ Board members. If there were no malicious intent, alerting the CEO would have sufficed.
> 
> Boubakar
> 
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
>> 
>> On 7 Jun 2015 08:11, "Sunday Folayan" <sunday.folayan at afrinic.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 07/06/2015 06:40, Noah wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I do not know which copy of the archive has been privately circulated in
>> > > the community, and I do not expect to discover that.
>> > >
>> > > That is why i adviced the board chair Sunday to next time be clear rather
>> > > than reporting things to the community  without concrete evidence else it
>> > > sends a wrong message.
>> >
>> > I thought it was more reasonable to notify the community instead of
>> > waiting for concrete evidence which may then be misconstrued as 1.
>> > concealment or 2. Living in denial.
>> 
>> You know someone once told the world there were WMD in some country. It was attacked and some years after no WMD were ever found but the damage was done.
>> 
>> The message i have been trying to send without living this seems like some small issue is that....
>> 
>> "Privacy breach of nomcom2015's Mailing List"
>> 
>> VS
>> 
>> "Configuration error which could lead to access of a private maillist"
>> 
>> Are two different things.....
>> 
>> > From: ...
>> > https://privacyassociation.org/media/pdf/resource_center/Data_Breach_Response_Whitepaper.pdf
>> > ... I understand that the acceptable standard is "immediately".
>> >
>> > In this case, 1. The Chair made a responsible statement, 2. the
>> > community got the right message, 3. The CEO is right on top of the
>> > issue, 4. The AGMM discussed and closed the case.
>> 
>> I rest my case.....
>> 
>> > Cheers.
>> >
>> > Sunday.
>> >
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Noah
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rpd mailing list
>> rpd at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20150607/caef1864/attachment.html>