Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Re: [afnog] A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!

Boubakar Barry boubakarbarry at
Sun Sep 21 15:11:16 UTC 2014

I wont accept to be dragged into an endless back and forth exchange of
posts nor to muddy paths, to be polite.

I made comments and suggestions based on what I read on the list, and
common sense dictates the need for AfriNIC to take action and bring all of
this to a satisfactory end for everyone, or at least for the
majority. They can be considred or ignored.

BTW, I have never pretented that I'm speaking on behalf of  the
AfriNIC community; and those who know me well should know that I don't need
any kind of shield to express my views.

My last post on this.


On Sunday, September 21, 2014, Sunday Folayan <sfolayan at> wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> On 21/09/2014 11:40, Boubakar Barry wrote:
> > Dear Adiel,
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Adiel Akplogan <adiel at
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> This allocation has followed the same process and procedure as
> >> any other requests sent to the IP analysts. In term of
> >> application and interpretation of the current policy nothing in
> >> this one was different. I think the RS team will be sending all
> >> the clarifications on the process shortly.
> >
> >
> > Good; the sooner the better.
> It has already been provided. See and please please acknowledge
> Ernest's email, just for the records.
> >
> >
> >> Beyond that, I think there is a lot of emotional speculation that
> >> we need to avoid to be dragged into … as you said in the interest
> >> of the organisation.
> >>
> >>
> > Speculation is unavoidable if legitimate information/clarification
> > requests by members are not dealt with in a timely manner;
> > certainly something that needs to be fixed.
> Information must be routed correctly. Asking Board to clarify
> operational issues is obviously not right. Asking for customer details
> from the organization or peddling them is equally unethical.
> Individuals should put on their own hats, instead of hiding behind the
> community cloak. Lastly, let the community read the "Qualifications"
> in reports, and act on them without delay.
> Sunday.
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> qOvRCY3Gz/fp3z1tKd8Sn11wn2mGZmQkHwazIMI49FI4l+8PQIFzoXlqFywOc67j
> 3QUUU6p6/ELHe4cyZVnb74hhrccZgMGNGj37yUP4r8NhufY1JDR9GwAmeiL4isQT
> xefXF5cFy0lsWnqc3/f/kEo8o5QxfwFFx6wLb7PDm5uSyD6uQbOmQSBn3izXLT3X
> 1pTSBQsEha6Y5LI/Ov5uZg8j4eCu+L6TwWmJhIsSCfgW8qX2s+WDMmMeBzljuD+e
> HCdoPycFVkDxzEJsVBJvmEracthK38C4hmAVyTxlrU12uj1lQnpLVZ3XM4QCJ/0=
> =I65W
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list