[AFRINIC-rpd] Summary as it stands on the Academic IPv4 Policy Proposal

[Nii Narku Quaynor]

On Jun 27, 2013, at 13:05, Sunday Folayan <sfolayan at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Nii Narku Quaynor <quaynor at ghana.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> Perhaps, you forgot this one
> 
> Objection 0 - obtaining resources with less than normal disclosure of *need* relative  today's procedures? Question strongly if this is a policy and if a solution is not workable by enhance procedures
> 
> 
> If the procedures could cover every situation and worked flawlessly, why would AfriNIC need policy?  Policy is there to supplement procedure and guide/sharpen procedure. This policy supplements the procedures in place to make it easier for an underprivileged and under resourced group in the community to access resources.
> 
Ok that's comment on second question. You always had the resources since 2005 and not impeded perhaps did not want :(

....coupled with less information provided with the requests ie the first question, remains a concern

Best
Nii
> Sunday.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20130627/054cc523/attachment.html>