Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AFRINIC-rpd] Summary as it stands on the Academic IPv4 Policy Proposal

Sunday Folayan sfolayan at
Thu Jun 27 14:09:14 UTC 2013

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Nii Narku Quaynor <quaynor at>wrote:

> >
>> >
>> Perhaps, you forgot this one
>> Objection 0 - obtaining resources with less than normal disclosure of
>> *need* relative  today's procedures? Question strongly if this is a policy
>> and if a solution is not workable by enhance procedures
> If the procedures could cover every situation and worked flawlessly, why
> would AfriNIC need policy?  Policy is there to supplement procedure and
> guide/sharpen procedure. This policy supplements the procedures in place to
> make it easier for an underprivileged and under resourced group in the
> community to access resources.
> Ok that's comment on second question. You always had the resources since
> 2005 and not impeded perhaps did not want :(

This is not clear to me. kindly clarify.

> ....coupled with less information provided with the requests ie the first
> question, remains a concern

I am sorry, Please restate the question. I am typing from a phone so I do
not have the full view.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list