<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br><br>On Jun 27, 2013, at 13:05, Sunday Folayan <<a href="mailto:sfolayan@gmail.com">sfolayan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Nii Narku Quaynor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:quaynor@ghana.com" target="_blank">quaynor@ghana.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">><br>
><br>
</div>Perhaps, you forgot this one<br>
<br>
Objection 0 - obtaining resources with less than normal disclosure of *need* relative today's procedures? Question strongly if this is a policy and if a solution is not workable by enhance procedures<br></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div>If the procedures could cover every situation and worked flawlessly, why would AfriNIC need policy? Policy is there to supplement procedure and guide/sharpen procedure. This policy supplements the procedures in place to make it easier for an underprivileged and under resourced group in the community to access resources.</div>
</div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Ok that's comment on second question. You always had the resources since 2005 and not impeded perhaps did not want :(<div><br></div><div>....coupled with less information provided with the requests ie the first question, remains a concern<div><br></div><div>Best</div><div>Nii<br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div style="">Sunday.</div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>