[rpd] AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chair Selection Candidates Matrix

Sat May 21 10:07:34 UTC 2022

Hi Enem,

You’re wrong in at least one point, so please do not speak for me.

I liked the previous co-chairs. They just did, in my opinion, major mistakes, as we all, as humans often do. This was backed-up by the recall committee, so not just a personal opinion.

I also believe that the actual co-chairs did also some mistakes, but I believe they are doing a better job in general.

By the way, the criteria of nomination by a resource member and being seconded by another one, is common in the other RIRs.

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

El 21/5/22, 11:58, "Emem William" <dwizard65 at gmail.com> escribió:

Dear Mirriam,

The fact that you, Caleb, Jordi and some few others did not like the former co-chair does not mean he was a disaster. Anyway you are entitled to your opinion about him and I leave it at that since your opinion does not translate to money in the bank. At least for a fact and from all indications, I know that @Caleb has always been jealous of his success and would always stop at nothing to pull him down; I cannot be surprised by whatever he says. Caleb, just keep grinding, one day your efforts might pay off. I am sure that if we dig into yours too, we will see some personal interests in it.

To the real issues.

1. The criteria that co-chairs should be nominated by a resource member was disagreed to in here, therefore it cannot be used. 

2. Policy liaison needs to tell us who the nominators of his forms are and they verified that they are not admin contact of resource members. Below is the message I got from the person who did the nomination word for word:

" Don't mind Afrinic staff, they are acting as 3rd force here. The two nominees are resource members; the 1st was by Econet SA and the Second nominee was clearly Unilorin. Both are resource members. They just need to do their homework properly. They were asking for personal information in the forms. Afrinic staff just need to do their homework properly. We do not deal with that on the mailing list."

This, I believe, is not only written in simple English but is also self explanatory.

Cheers

On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 22:12, Mirriam <mirriamlauren at yahoo.com> wrote:

Hello Emem and PDWG

Going by criteria J.

J. The intended volunteer must be endorsed and/or nominated by a registered contact of an  AFRINIC Resource Member.

Your dear Mr.Faruk nominators and seconders don't even exist as per the matrix. 

Just to note that the PDP does not need such academic qualification. You remember we had one of the recent past co-chairs who is a Dr. PhD. The PDP turned out to be a complete total disaster for the PDWG participants.

The PDP is not about being an academic Dr. or Prof with PhDs. The PDP is about understanding how to gauge consensus and how to follow the PDP as a co-chair and this does not need what you are talking about Mr.Faruk as his academic qualifications are outside the scope of the PDP.

I have been attending the past two PPM where Darwin has been cochair and I am confident like many other participants in his ability.

I will go with Darwin based on real data and his performance.

Seems like Titles are a thing now, please allow me.

Mirriam

Daughter of the Nile

The Nubian Queen

The Last of the Dora Milage Warriors

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 5:59 PM, Emem William

<dwizard65 at gmail.com> wrote:

_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-- 

Emem E. William. OND (Computer Science), BSc (Telecommunication).

Plan Control Manager (ISDP) at Huawei Technologies

Member of IEEE, ISOC

Member of Amnesty International.

Phone: (+234) 703 370 7621.

_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd 

**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20220521/c5be4f36/attachment-0001.html>