[rpd] Last Call - RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space AFPUB-2019-GEN-006-DRAFT03.

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Mike,

 

Fully agree on this:

 

Also agreed. However there have been objections from people regarding alleged negative impacts on network operations. In this case I think it is reasonable that the objector either:

 

·         identifies the *actual* network they operate; or

·         acknowledges that their objection is based on a hypothetical network and not actually based in reality (academics have great ideas too); or

·         admits that they are a paid shill for someone else. 

 

 

It will be awesome to justify objections and simplify the work of the authors in improving the policy or responding to the objections, and for the chairs to evaluate all the points.

 

I will also say that if somene is participanting with an anonymous email, because it has a conflict of interest with his employeer, to state so (without giving employee deatails). That will help to balance if some opinions look contradictory, to understand why.

 

Saludos,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 8/6/21 10:41, "Mike Silber" <silber.mike at gmail.com> escribió:

 

Hi Jordi



On 8 Jun 2021, at 09:44, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

 



 

While I understand your point, I think that we need to agree that sometimes, non-operators, also provide points of view that help to improve policies. 

 

I do agree. However we need to accept that those contributions are largely on legal / policy issues.

 

I am a legal / policy person and the views expressed on this policy regarding the RIR system and the legal and policy issues are without foundation. As I am a legal / policy person I don’t presume to comment on network operations.



Also, there may be policies where the discussion will not be well balanced if only operators participate, because are not so closely related to operation, and instead to how to distribute resources that belong to the overall community.

 

Also agreed. However there have been objections from people regarding alleged negative impacts on network operations. In this case I think it is reasonable that the objector either:

 

·         identifies the *actual* network they operate; or

·         acknowledges that their objection is based on a hypothetical network and not actually based in reality (academics have great ideas too); or

·         admits that they are a paid shill for someone else. 

 

Regards

 

Mike


_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210608/fe72bdac/attachment.html>