Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM - Status @ 9 April 2021

Adebisi Yusuf adebc007 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 15 18:02:37 UTC 2021


Dear Saul,
Is the requirements for nomination stipulated in the CPM or was there a
consensus around that in the WG?
We cannot modify the CPM without a draft proposal and without reaching
consensus.
Thanks.

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, 18:35 Saul Stein, <saul at enetworks.co.za> wrote:


> This is nothing to do with consensus.

> The candidates were disqualified since they did not meet the requirements

> for nomination ie a proposer/nominator and seconder and that the nominator

> actually knows the candidate and the other potential Candice withdrew.

>

>

> On 15 Apr 2021, at 19:24, Adebisi Yusuf <adebc007 at gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Dear PDWG,

> I totally agree to this. I disagree with the process because it shows no

> fairness. I see no reason why we would disqualify some candidates based on

> rules that never reached consensus.

>

>

>

>

> On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 16:19 Steffie Padasay, <steffiegsay at gmail.com> wrote:

>

>> Hi everyone,

>>

>> I'd like to ask why are we rushing into choosing Darwin and Vincent?

>> Totally have nothing against them but it seems so unprofessional that we

>> just left other legitimate candidates in the air (Ibeanusi for example) and

>> rushed to choose them. Furthermore, why should the elected candidates serve

>> 1-2 years? We’re pushing for ad hoc elections because of the current

>> co-chairs’ disqualification so the smartest move would be to elect new ones

>> in the next meeting. Seems fishy, that’s all.

>>

>> p.s.: Disqualifying Anthony is also questionable because the grounds for

>> disqualification does not even exist in the CPM but only on a deadline (one

>> which could be probably extended or given enough leeway for others) and

>> does not discourage participation from anybody in every walk of life. IMO,

>> Anthony should also be still in the running.

>>

>> Cheers,

>> Steffie

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210415/06ec9d4a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list