Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM - Status @ 9 April 2021

Adebisi Yusuf adebc007 at
Thu Apr 15 17:24:22 UTC 2021

Dear PDWG,
I totally agree to this. I disagree with the process because it shows no
fairness. I see no reason why we would disqualify some candidates based on
rules that never reached consensus.

On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 16:19 Steffie Padasay, <steffiegsay at> wrote:

> Hi everyone,


> I'd like to ask why are we rushing into choosing Darwin and Vincent?

> Totally have nothing against them but it seems so unprofessional that we

> just left other legitimate candidates in the air (Ibeanusi for example) and

> rushed to choose them. Furthermore, why should the elected candidates serve

> 1-2 years? We’re pushing for ad hoc elections because of the current

> co-chairs’ disqualification so the smartest move would be to elect new ones

> in the next meeting. Seems fishy, that’s all.


> p.s.: Disqualifying Anthony is also questionable because the grounds for

> disqualification does not even exist in the CPM but only on a deadline (one

> which could be probably extended or given enough leeway for others) and

> does not discourage participation from anybody in every walk of life. IMO,

> Anthony should also be still in the running.


> Cheers,

> Steffie

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list