Search RPD Archives
[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM - Status @ 9 April 2021
adebc007 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 15 17:24:22 UTC 2021
I totally agree to this. I disagree with the process because it shows no
fairness. I see no reason why we would disqualify some candidates based on
rules that never reached consensus.
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 16:19 Steffie Padasay, <steffiegsay at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'd like to ask why are we rushing into choosing Darwin and Vincent?
> Totally have nothing against them but it seems so unprofessional that we
> just left other legitimate candidates in the air (Ibeanusi for example) and
> rushed to choose them. Furthermore, why should the elected candidates serve
> 1-2 years? We’re pushing for ad hoc elections because of the current
> co-chairs’ disqualification so the smartest move would be to elect new ones
> in the next meeting. Seems fishy, that’s all.
> p.s.: Disqualifying Anthony is also questionable because the grounds for
> disqualification does not even exist in the CPM but only on a deadline (one
> which could be probably extended or given enough leeway for others) and
> does not discourage participation from anybody in every walk of life. IMO,
> Anthony should also be still in the running.
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD