Search RPD Archives
[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM |
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Apr 7 16:41:19 UTC 2021
I need to disagree with you here.
Both proposals reached consensus. That’s a fact.
One of them is pending on an appeal, so the board need to wait for that to be resolved.
In any case, the board could return both proposals to the PDWG, if they have *strong* reasons to object to the ratification. They could even decide that they ratify the proposal but also take a “contrary” proposal, which will take immediate effect, to be endorsed by the community in the next meeting, which can leave without effect the ratification.
El 7/4/21 18:30, "Noah" <noah at neo.co.tz> escribió:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 18:54 John Hay, <john at sanren.ac.za> wrote:
Even if that proposal got lost between co-chairs and AfriNIC, it should not be a big deal.
It is a big deal, which is why WG participants are concerned and are asking the former co-chairs to forward it to the rpd list as FYI.
The main interest is that report that was prepared because that report will indicate how the so said consensus was achieved and if the PDP process was followed.
Once we have new co-chairs, the authors can just submit their last version.
If we got consensus on the last version,
Co-chairs declaring consensus does not mean it is what it is, because consensus is a path not a forced destination and the WG is still in disagreement on the said proposals.
FWIW, not everyone within the WG agrees that the proposals archived consensus and that is why an appeal was launched and submitted by a number of working group participants against the Resource Transfer Proposal because appeals form part of the PDP.
surely we should get it again on the same version or with very little tweaking,
Major tweaking if you asked me.
_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD