[rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM |

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi AK,

 

Tks a lot for your confirmation, we really needed it.

 

I fully understand that the board could tell that this could not be done for the “immediate next” board meeting. The PDP doesn’t state nothing about that, however, the document should be kept by the board for the next meeting after that one. I think that’s a very rational way to handle it.

 

It will be good anyway, that you provide to the community a copy of all the email exchanges. Those messages belong to the community, nothing private there.

 

I think it is clear now that the board didn’t tell the true to the community. It is a clear and severe breach. I don’t really understand why this is being done by the board, same as nobody understood the suspension of the AC, and many other facts related to the PDP.

 

I never believed there is a plot, but I’m starting to change my mind. I hope the board can provide clarifications and demonstrate all the facts.

 

I’m not sure now also to understand how the staff said they couldn’t find anything on this and how Eddy confirmed that they never got the ratification request.

 

Really sad situation. Yes, the board is a membership thing, but it has serious implications in terms of the PDP and thus, the overall community.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 6/4/21 14:50, "ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE" <oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> escribió:

 

Dear Jordi and all

I was previously on sabbatical leave for personal reasons.

I want to confirm to you and the community once again that the document for ratification was prepared and sent to the board. However, after sending it we were informed that it would not be considered by the board at that time because it was done few days before the Board meeting and subsequently we were also informed of other reasons and the letter written to us by the legal adviser. We agreed at that time that we should seek the consent of the community before re-representing the document after expressing our surprise with the new timeline more especially after working tirelessly on the ratification document.  

I want to also confirm that we have in the past sent documents for ratification to the board a few days before its meeting and it was considered hence we were at that time surprised about the new timelines. 

 

I hope this clarifies this issue.

Thanks

 

AK

 

 

 

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:02 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

I only want to know the complete true.

 

If the ratification was asked, even if “incomplete” we should know. What I can’t accept is ignoring who is not saying the complete true. Any degree of distrust is a complete failure of AFRINIC and the community. 

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 6/4/21 12:53, "Daniel Yakmut" <yakmutd at googlemail.com> escribió:

 

Dear Jordi.

Is this a standard practice or is it an attempt by you to arm twist AK and the board?

But I agree that if there is no reason that is injurious, then the email exchanges should be released.

Simply,

Daniel

On 06/04/2021 11:18 am, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:

Hi,

 

I understand that, however, I can’t trust it, very unfortunately.

 

The chairs said they sent it. AK told it also to me in private email, and having seen the last actions from the board, I’ve more reasons to trust AK than AFRINIC.

 

Either AK is right or is not. If AK is right, he should demonstrate it, very simple. There is nothing secret in emails exchanged with the staff or board. We know other chairs always copied the list; nothing should be different this time.

 

If AK can’t demonstrate it, then how we can trust him as a co-chair? Believe me, I will prefer to have the emails demonstrating who is not telling the complete true here.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 5/4/21 18:38, "AFRINIC Policy Liaison" <policy-liaison at afrinic.net> escribió:

 

Dear Jordi,

This question has been raised for quite some time and our team has checked and double-checked even in the logs and found no evidence. However, if the date and time as well as other details about the emails are shared, the technical team will check again and clear this situation.

Regards

Policy Liaison Team

On 05/04/2021 12:50 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
However, one thing that worries me is if we should trust our previous co-chair or the board and I'm referring here to the fact that AK has told the community that the policies that reached consensus were sent to the board for ratification and the board and the CEO denied that. All the communication from the co-chairs and the board regarding that has never been disclosed, without any explanation about that, even if should have been done copy to the list, for a pure transparency reason.
 
So, please, AK, if you really think that you did right and you can do a new term without those errors and, consequently, we can trust you, this is your perfect opportunity to clarify all that by copying all those emails to the list.
-- 
AFRINIC Policy Liaison.
t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | w:www.afrinic.net
facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia
_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd 


**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.


_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

 

Website, Weekly Bulletin UGPortal PGPortal

 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210406/8e3c9911/attachment-0001.html>