[rpd] Call for interest for PDWG chairs

[Wijdane Goubi]

Hello,
I totally and fully agree on what was mentioned by Ibeanusi because it’s
been quite some time where the focus is only on some objections. As an
example: the point G which was clearly neither the only objection nor the
only controversial point. Not to mention how many members like myself, have
mentioned plenty of time that C and D alongside G are controversial and
remain unclear yet there was no attention whatsoever towards them.
Therefore, I insist on giving equal attention and focus to each and every
point of the criteria set that have been mentioned by any member before, as
well as taking into account either editing or removing the other points
too. Moreover, the working environment should be as healthy and as clear as
possible, only then we can have an open and fair community because at the
moment I do not think it is the case.
Regards,
Wijdane

Le ven. 2 avr. 2021 à 15:08, AFRINIC Policy Liaison <
policy-liaison at afrinic.net> a écrit :


>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> * Dear PDWG, The policy liaison team has shared with the PDWG members the

> latest list of criteria based on the discussions on the list here:

> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/012851.html

> <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/012851.html> We have heard,

> collected and processed all feedback that the PDWG members have provided on

> the list as a facilitator here is what we have taken note of: - There are

> still members of the PDWG who have raised concerns on one or more of the

> criteria. We kindly remind the PDWG members that there is still room for

> proposing amendments, introducing new criteria, or removing existing

> criteria.   - Some PDWG members  have objected to using the list as

> criteria for eligibility and proposed using them as guidelines for the

> selection of candidates instead. We kindly ask the PDWG members to agree

> among themselves on the usage of the criteria so that the PDWG can

> establish the best way forward and be mindful of the timelines.  At the

> same time, we also encourage  PDWG members  interested in the co-chairs

> positions to respond to the call for interest. Regards Policy Liaison Team

> ……………………………………………………………. Cher PDWG, Le policy liaison team a partagé avec

> les membres du PDWG la dernière liste de critères basée sur les discussions

> de la liste ici : https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/012851.html

> <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/012851.html>. Nous avons

> entendu, collecté et traité tous les commentaires que les membres du PDWG

> ont fournis sur la liste en tant que facilitateur ; voici ce dont nous

> avons pris note : Il y a encore des membres du PDWG qui ont soulevé des

> préoccupations sur un ou plusieurs critères. Nous rappelons aux membres du

> PDWG qu'il est encore possible de proposer des amendements, d'introduire de

> nouveaux critères ou de supprimer des critères existants.    Certains

> membres du PDWG se sont opposés à l'utilisation de la liste de critères

> comme critères d'éligibilité et ont proposé de les utiliser plutôt comme

> lignes directrices pour la sélection des candidats. Nous demandons aux

> membres du PDWG de se mettre d'accord sur l'utilisation des critères afin

> que le PDWG puisse établir la meilleure façon de procéder et respecter les

> délais. Dans le même temps, nous encourageons également les membres du PDWG

> intéressés par les postes de coprésidents à répondre à l'appel à

> manifestation d'intérêt. *

>

>

> Nos salutations

>

> *Policy Liaison Team*

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210404/e986c3bd/attachment.html>