Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Eligibility Criteria for PDWG chairs

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Thu Apr 1 22:29:06 UTC 2021


With a structure that includes just two co-chairs, I must completely agree with Noah here.

Owen



> On Apr 1, 2021, at 6:49 AM, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>

>

>

> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, 16:26 Brice ABBA, <brice at afrinic.net <mailto:brice at afrinic.net>> wrote:

> [Français en bas]

>

> “The intended volunteer should not be the author of any of the policy proposals currently under discussion and if need be, agree to recuse oneself as author/co-author of any policy proposals under discussion, or simply recuse oneself from the position as Co-Chairs pending his or her proposal being discussed.”

>

> And who will take up the role of ownership of the said proposal?

>

> Will the said Author as co-chair also spend time gathering inputs for their own proposal?

>

> And how will the said Author turned co-chair argue for their proposal?

>

> Imho, members of the PDWG can choose to participate in the PDP, as WG members, managers (co-chairs) , AC members etc but can't be both, so as to avoid finding one self in a conflicting positions because its not ideal to be both a judge and executioner.

>

> If authors want to manage the WG, then they should withdraw their proposals completely. If someone in the WG likes the idea behind that withdrawn proposal, they can independently submit a new one for discussion.

>

> Noah

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210401/817a2c8d/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list