Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Appeal Committee Response - Re: (Fwd) Appeal Committee status

Mirriam mirriamlauren at
Sat Feb 20 08:06:53 UTC 2021

Hi Tom,
Thanks for your comment and i actually don't have a problem with AC continuing to do their work which some of its members have resigned due to some concerns Wafa raised in the post she shared with the community.
Are we now ok with sweeping these concerns under the carpet yet AC members are resigning? 
The ToR never anticipated misconduct and concerns like the ones Wafa indicated and current AC members going on with business as usual even calls to question the work they do going forward. 
This is clear definition of impunity and shame to this community.

Disappointed Mirriam

On Saturday, February 20, 2021, 2:31:24 AM GMT+3, Tom Ochang <dontommy24 at> wrote:

Inline with what Miriam asked, I believe we should first of all address what the appeal committee resigned members raised as reason for resignation before we start debating about replacement. If the issues raised by the resigned AC members is not resolved , we may end up having more resignations from the replacements. TOR should be relevant please.Tom Ochang
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021, 00:09 Mirriam via RPD, <rpd at> wrote:

Hi all,
It is really sad reading all these exchanges where I see members pushing for AC to continue business as usual even when there has been allegations of behaviour misconduct which are yet to be addressed.
Is business as usual and hiding behind ToR  more important than tackling the issues that spans way back which has led to members resigning from this committee?


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:43 AM, Ibeanusi Elvis<ibeanusielvis at> wrote: _______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at

RPD mailing list
RPD at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list