[rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON: Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs - SUMMARY

[Sunday Folayan]

Jordi,

There was the option you did not list: ... "Follow the CPM, with the 
PDWG filling the vacancy by calling for volunteers, if a larger than 
needed number, then follow with a selection/voting"

Sunday.

On 2/16/21 12:18 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:

> Hi all,

>

> As I've indicated a few days ago, I've elaborated a summary of the discussion on the list, happened until noon CET today.

>

> Find it attached.

>

> I'm convinced that some may disagree. I disagree myself with the choice that the consensus shows, however, until the board takes a decision, in order keep my neutrality, I will not explain why, because even if I disagree, I can concede which that choice, and this is what consensus means.

>

> If anyone believes that I've misinterpreted his/her view (note that the summary is not a literal transcription), please say so, clearly stating your position and justifying the objections. I will consider updating the document with any inputs received until midnight CET before sending it to the board (and copy the list).

>

> Please, keep it simple, we just want to understand if there are valid objections to option 1, which seems to be the one that reached consensus:

>

> "Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census)."

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>   

>   

>

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210216/fa7904c7/attachment.html>