Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON: Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs - SUMMARY

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Tue Feb 16 12:02:11 UTC 2021


Hi Sunday,



In fact I mention that in the document, not using the same words/procedure but same results:



“Last, but not least. There have been some inputs about choosing the chairs by consensus. This is a perfectly valid choice, and in fact, this was the path followed, in the last elections, when several candidates withdraw from the on-line remote elections process. So, going for option 1, and asking the candidates to discuss among them and with the community, opens the door to that alternative, if most of the candidates could withdraw and even suggest which other candidates they are supporting.”



Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet







El 16/2/21 12:39, "Sunday Folayan" <sfolayan at skannet.com> escribió:



Jordi,

There was the option you did not list: ... "Follow the CPM, with the PDWG filling the vacancy by calling for volunteers, if a larger than needed number, then follow with a selection/voting"

Sunday.

On 2/16/21 12:18 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
Hi all,

As I've indicated a few days ago, I've elaborated a summary of the discussion on the list, happened until noon CET today.

Find it attached.

I'm convinced that some may disagree. I disagree myself with the choice that the consensus shows, however, until the board takes a decision, in order keep my neutrality, I will not explain why, because even if I disagree, I can concede which that choice, and this is what consensus means.

If anyone believes that I've misinterpreted his/her view (note that the summary is not a literal transcription), please say so, clearly stating your position and justifying the objections. I will consider updating the document with any inputs received until midnight CET before sending it to the board (and copy the list).

Please, keep it simple, we just want to understand if there are valid objections to option 1, which seems to be the one that reached consensus:

"Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census)."

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet

 




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210216/6e526cf0/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list