[rpd] Reciprocity of the inter-RIR transfer policies

[Paschal Ochang]

Thank you and well-done Madhvi for these clarifications. Having read
through both versions the wordings indirectly mean the same thing and is
essential to checkmate compliance issues. Thereore an updated proposal with
the requested changes will not really affect the potential meaning and
outcome IMHO. We look forward to reflected changes to achieve maximum
compatibility.
Welldone.
On Wednesday, October 28, 2020, Madhvi Gokool <madhvi at afrinic.net> wrote:


> Dear Ekaterina

> On 28/10/2020 3:37 PM, Ekaterina Kalugina wrote:

>

> Dear all,

>

> It seems to me that a mistake has been made when requesting the

> compatibility verification.

>

> Dear Madhvi, the two links you sent to the two different versions of the

> Resource Transfer Policy proposals are completely identical and both lead

> to the older version (DRAFT-02).

>

> Apologies .  Draft 03 is published on the website at

> https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d3

>

> Also in the report it states that the two proposals are identical, but in

> fact - they aren't.

>

> This was not inferred. Lesson learnt - The exact sentence from the

> proposal will be referred to.

>

>

> This was a problematic sentence in the DRAFT-O2 :“The source must be the

> current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR

> and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.”

>

> In the DRAFT-03 this sentence has been changed and goes as follows:

> *"*The source must be the current and rightful holder of the IPv4 address

> resources registered with any RIR , and shall not be involved in any

> disputes as to those resources' status."

>

> As per draft-03 , The text is as follows :- "*5.7.3.1 The source must be

> the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with

> any RIR, and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR,

> and shall not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those

> resources*

>

>

> *https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011422.html

> <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011422.html> contains the

> proposal submitted by the authors. *

>

> Therefore, I would kindly ask you to send a new correct compatibility

> request for the latest version of the proposal. Until this is done, there

> is no point in further discussion.

>

> The latest version is available at  https://afrinic.net/policy/

> proposals/2019-v4-003-d4 . The compatibility with other RIRs  has been

> requested.

>

> Best,

> Ekaterina

>

> Regards

>

> Madhvi

>



-- 
Kind regards,

Paschal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201029/a8c3da80/attachment.html>