[rpd] Reciprocity of the inter-RIR transfer policies

[Ibeanusi Elvis]

Dear Madhvi, Dear community; 

First, thanks for your diligence and hardworking, and as well the links to the various versions of the currently disputed transfer policy. As Gaby highlighted and as changes has been made to the debated section 5.7.3.1 of the Resource Transfer Policy by the authors in the latest version of the policy, I believe that issue of compatibility with other RIRs will be resolved and thus, move forward. We shall await the latest version of the Resource Transfer Proposal compatibility report for further discussion. 

Best regards, 
Elvis. 


> On Oct 28, 2020, at 21:00, Madhvi Gokool <madhvi at afrinic.net> wrote:

> 

> Dear Ekaterina

> 

> On 28/10/2020 3:37 PM, Ekaterina Kalugina wrote:

>> Dear all,

>> 

>> It seems to me that a mistake has been made when requesting the compatibility verification. 

>> 

>> Dear Madhvi, the two links you sent to the two different versions of the Resource Transfer Policy proposals are completely identical and both lead to the older version (DRAFT-02).

> Apologies .  Draft 03 is published on the website at https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d3 <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d3>

>> Also in the report it states that the two proposals are identical, but in fact - they aren't. 

> This was not inferred. Lesson learnt - The exact sentence from the proposal will be referred to.

>> 

>> This was a problematic sentence in the DRAFT-O2 :“The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.”

>> 

>> In the DRAFT-03 this sentence has been changed and goes as follows: 

>> "The source must be the current and rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR , and shall not be involved in any disputes as to those resources' status."

> As per draft-03 , The text is as follows :- "5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rightful holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR, and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR, and shall not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources

> 

> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011422.html <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011422.html> contains the proposal submitted by the authors.

> 

>> 

>> Therefore, I would kindly ask you to send a new correct compatibility request for the latest version of the proposal. Until this is done, there is no point in further discussion. 

> The latest version is available at  https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d4 <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d4> . The compatibility with other RIRs  has been requested.

>> 

>> Best, 

>> 

>> Ekaterina 

>>  

>> 

> Regards

> 

> Madhvi

> 

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201029/751907d7/attachment-0001.html>