[rpd] Reciprocity of the inter-RIR transfer policies

[Ekaterina Kalugina]

Dear all,

It seems to me that a mistake has been made when requesting the
compatibility verification.

Dear Madhvi, the two links you sent to the two different versions of the
Resource Transfer Policy proposals are completely identical and both lead
to the older version (DRAFT-02). Also in the report it states that the two
proposals are identical, but in fact - they aren't.

This was a problematic sentence in the DRAFT-O2 :“The source must be the
current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources registered with any RIR
and shall be in compliance with the policies of the receiving RIR.”

In the DRAFT-03 this sentence has been changed and goes as follows:
*"*The source must be the current and rightful holder of the IPv4 address
resources registered with any RIR , and shall not be involved in any
disputes as to those resources' status."

Therefore, I would kindly ask you to send a new correct compatibility
request for the latest version of the proposal. Until this is done, there
is no point in further discussion.

Best,

Ekaterina







On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, 10:22 Frank Habicht <geier at geier.ne.tz> wrote:


> Hi Gaby,

>

> at what position would you like to insert the new text?

>

> would you say it changes the policy proposal?

>

> would you like this work group to have a chance to discuss your proposal?

>

> Thanks,

> Frank

>

>

> On 28/10/2020 12:03, Gaby Giner wrote:

> > Hello Madhvi, everyone

> >

> > Thank you for getting back to us about the compatibility/reciprocity of

> > the resource transfer proposals.

> >

> > What I have noticed is that there doesn’t seem to be a problem with the

> > Resource Transfer Policy if a simple modification is done with the

> > following sentence:

> >

> > "The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address

> > resources registered with any RIR and shall be in compliance with the

> > policies of the receiving RIR."

> >

> > Once done, the policy will be compatible with the RIRs and then we can

> > proceed and not waste any more time to implement it.

> >

> > Thanks, Gaby

> >

> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, 1:17 PM Madhvi Gokool, <madhvi at afrinic.net

> > <mailto:madhvi at afrinic.net>> wrote:

> >

> >     Dear PDWG

> >

> >     Please find the other RIRs' response regarding the

> >     compatibility/reciprocity of the following proposals in the document

> >     attached.

> >

> >     Resource Transfer Policy(draft 2)

> >     <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d2#proposal> -

> >     AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT02

> >

> >     Resource Transfer Policy(draft 3)

> >     <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d2#proposal> -

> >     AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03

> >

> >     AFRINIC Number Resources Transfer Policy -

> >     AFPUB-2019-GEN-002-DRAFT02

> >     <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-gen-002-d2>

> >

> >     IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) -

> >     AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT04

> >     <https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-ipv4-002-d4>

> >

> >     If you are commenting on a specific proposal , please ensure that

> >     you mention the policy name or ID in the subject line .

> >

> >     Kind Regards

> >

> >     Madhvi

> >

> >     --

> >     Madhvi Gokool

> >     Senior IP Resources Specialist

> >     AFRINIC Ltd.

> >     t:  +230 403 5100 | f: +230 466 6758 |

> >     w: www.afrinic.net <http://www.afrinic.net>

> >

> >

> >

> >     On 23/09/2020 9:51 AM, Madhvi Gokool wrote:

> >>      Dear PDWG

> >>

> >>     During the Policy discussions in the AFRINIC-32 PPM  on 17 Sep

> >>     2020, there was a debate regarding the reciprocity of one

> >>     inter-RIR transfer policy proposal with ARIN. The Policy Liaison

> >>     had responded that since there are 3 policy proposals under

> >>     discussion and that two of them had undergone revision in 2020 ,

> >>     AFRINIC shall contact ARIN to get their authoritative response in

> >>     regard to the reciprocity of all the *3 proposals*.

> >>

> >>     Since the  LACNIC, RIPE and APNIC RIRs all have inter-RIR transfer

> >>     policies, and we, AFRINIC do not have their assessment of the

> >>     reciprocity of the 3 policy proposals under discussion on record,

> >>     AFRINIC has therefore reached out to all  4 RIRs to  get their

> >>     inputs regarding the reciprocity of the*three *policy proposals

> >>     that were discussed in the AFRINIC PPM last week.

> >>

> >>     We shall update you once we have received the updates from the  4

> >>     RIRs. "

> >>

> >>     Kind Regards

> >>

> >>     Madhvi

> >>

> >>     _______________________________________________

> >>     RPD mailing list

> >>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> >>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

> >

> >     _______________________________________________

> >     RPD mailing list

> >     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> >     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> >     <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > RPD mailing list

> > RPD at afrinic.net

> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> >

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201028/079b4191/attachment.html>