[rpd] Reversal of Consensus on Resource Transfer Policy

[ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE]

Dear Gregoire,
Please note that we have gone through your appeal and we are not in any
way afraid of your appeal.
Please feel free to even appeal this reversal.  We took this decision based
on what the community has asked us to do. We are here to listen to the
genuine need of the community while following the CPM correctly and to the
best of our ability to avoid anarchy.
  We have consistently asked you to categorically point out ANY section of
the CPM we have breached. Up till today and for weeks now you only kept on
saying *we Co-chairs have breached the CPM without ANY proof *to back it up
only the fact that we have refused to dance to your personal tune. We have
a lot of respect for you just like we do for every member of the community
but please respect yourself so that you can be a good example to the
generation behind you.
You asked us to follow the precedence from previous Chairs, we did by
following your advice. Only for you to now start singing another song or
have you forgotten s*o quickly that chairs in the past have had reasons to
change their decisions?*. Oh is it because we refuse to dance to your
personal tune that you decided to circulate falsehood about the breach of
the CPM on the mailing list?
Ordinarily, we would have ignored your noise, but sometimes if we don't
tell the truth. falsehood can be regarded as the truth.
*Please point out clearly any Section of the CPM we have breached*.
thanks
Co-Chair
PDWG


On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 9:32 PM Gregoire EHOUMI <gregoire.ehoumi at yahoo.fr>
wrote:


> Dear co-chairs,

>

> You create a lot of confusion and you don't follow the PDP. Which section

> of the PDP allows extension of the last call after you have ended it ?

>

> You also seem to ignore that according to appeal ToR section 5.1.e, a

> failure​ ​to​ ​respond​ ​to​ ​or​ ​conclude​ ​discussions​ ​within​ ​one​

> ​week​ ​of​ ​a​ ​request​ ​from​ ​a complainant​ ​by​ ​the​ ​Chair(s)​

> ​shall​ ​be​ ​considered​ ​sufficient​ ​grounds​ ​under​ ​sections​ ​5.1(c)

> and​ ​5.1(d).

> So your decision made on the 7th October was challenged as from 8th

> October. You did not conclude satisfactorily to the requests from the

> complainants within the following week. So the appeal filed on the 15th is

> valid as your decision stands and can’t be reversed.

>

> Please stop this continuous violation of the rules on which AFRINIC

> operates.

>

> Failure to obey should be considered as perjury.

>

> Regards,

> --

> Gregoire

>

> On Oct 17, 2020, at 12:02 PM, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE <

> oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:

>

> Dear colleagues,

>

> Despite our belief that this policy has covered almost all of the concerns

> raised especially the major objections, we would like to give the community

> more time to discern after considering the community's feedback on the

> consensus declared on the  Resource Transfer Polic.

>

> We, the co-chairs, have changed our decision and opt to extend the last

> call for one more week for prudence's sake.

>

> Thank you.

>

> Co-Chair

> PDWG

>

>

> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/>, Weekly Bulletin

> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal

> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal

> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201018/d3a14f82/attachment-0001.html>