[rpd] Reversal of Consensus on Resource Transfer Policy

[ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE]

Dear Fernando,
Please read your previous email. You have consistently asked that we give
more time to discussions on this policy proposal. You accused us of rushing
to pass this proposal. Based on this, we decided to reverse our
discussion to give more time, *Only for you to start singing another song*.
It is obvious what your intentions are. Please read all your previous
emails. In fact, we co-chair have decided to  *Categorically* pick you out
so that the community can see clearly. PLEASE pick ANY of your previous
emails about this proposal and point out ANY of your concerns about this
proposal that has not been addressed by the authors. If you are able to
point out ANY of your previous comments on this policy that is yet to be
addressed we PROMISE to look into it.
We take it from here.

Co-Chair PDWG

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 6:06 PM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>
wrote:


> Hello

>

> May I ask what type mess is this ?

> Is it not enough all the mess that happened in the previous weeks, the

> request from many people to bring it back to discussion, the lack of

> consensus on major thing and now this ?

>

> If the Co-Chairs believe the policy has covered almost all of the concerns

> and major objections raised and they gave their final decision already

> stating that would be the one reported to the Board what is the point to go

> back ?

>

> What are they trying to achieve with this lone week more of "re-opening of

> Last Call" ? What 1 week extension will change in this context and at this

> point ?

> Sincerely, I've never ever seen such situation in any similar policy or

> Internet governance forums I participate.

>

> Co-Chairs, please stop this, stick to your decision and face the Appeal

> that is already ongoing as a result of the many issues that happened so

> far. Please don't worse it.

>

> Regards

> Fernando

> On 17/10/2020 13:02, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:

>

> Dear colleagues,

>

> Despite our belief that this policy has covered almost all of the concerns

> raised especially the major objections, we would like to give the community

> more time to discern after considering the community's feedback on the

> consensus declared on the  Resource Transfer Polic.

>

> We, the co-chairs, have changed our decision and opt to extend the last

> call for one more week for prudence's sake.

>

> Thank you.

>

> Co-Chair

> PDWG

>

>

> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin

> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal

> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal

> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201018/35db3cea/attachment.html>