[rpd] End of Last call

[Vivien ASSANGBE WOTTO]

Hello, 

J'ai suivi avec attention les discussions depuis la réunion virtuelle. 

Mais, je ne peux pas comprendre comment les co-chairs peuvent affirmer
que le consensus a été maintenu alors même que le consensus tel que
déterminé pendant la réunion était très problématique. 

J'en appelle à la sagesse des co-chairs de bien vouloir reconsidérer
leur decision. 

Seule l'Afrique, doit toujours gagner dans tout ce que nous faisons ici

-G. Vivien  

Le 08-10-2020 18:10, Gregoire EHOUMI via RPD a écrit :


> I agree with Jordi on this.  

> 

> This is a total mess between the policy proposal versions and the discussions.  

> 

> I can see that the co-chairs did not take into account outstanding objections.

> 

> Therefore, I urge co-chairs to reconsider this decision.  

> 

> --

> Gregoire 

> 

> On Oct. 8, 2020 3:42 a.m., JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

> 

>> Hi Moses, all, 

>> 

>> I feel that there is a fundamental mistake here and I beg you to reconsider it. 

>> 

>> You've not waited for the staff confirmation about the reciprocity of the Inter-RIR transfers. What happens if now the staff comes back and confirms that we can't decide in our policy what do to in other regions, so there is no reciprocity and so, we can't implement this policy? 

>> 

>> Accordingly, I strongly suggest that you change your mind, following section 3.5 of the PDP: "A person who disagrees with the actions taken by the Chair(s) shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the PDWG". 

>> 

>> The reasons for this are: 

>> 

>> * The only valid proposal version is the one that is published at the web site and then announced to the list. The authors did changes several times, that aren't there. As we are discussing version 2, we should have a version 2.x to show those.

>> * The staff must confirm the reciprocity of the last 2.x version in the list. As indicated in 3.4.3, you can extend the last-call to ensure that this is matched.

>> * This and other aspects, have been indicated several times by myself and others during the last-call. Those are valid-objections that remain unresolved and if you extend the last-call and agree with the latest changes from the authors, then could make sense, otherwise, it is impossible that you can declare the last-call and still "consensus".

>> 

>> Regards, 

>> 

>> Jordi 

>> 

>> @jordipalet 

>> 

>> El 8/10/20 1:37, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com> escribió: 

>> 

>> Hello PDWG members, 

>> 

>> Following the last online PPM held on 16th-17th September 2020. Last call was announced on 21st September 2020 for the following policy proposals. 

>> 

>> ·         Board Prerogatives on the PDP 

>> 

>> ·         Resource Transfer Policy 

>> 

>> This is to further announce that the  last call period for the above proposals has ended, based on feedback received from the community and the editorial changes made by authors to address community concerns, the consensus decision from AFRINIC32 is still maintained.

>> 

>> Co-Chairs will now send a report to the Board recommending ratification of the two above proposals in line with CPM 3.0.

>> 

>> Regards,

>> 

>> Co-Chairs   

>> 

>> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd 

>> **********************************************

>> IPv4 is over

>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

>> http://www.theipv6company.com

>> The IPv6 Company

>> 

>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

> 

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201014/e30cbbfd/attachment.html>