[rpd] End of Last call

[Daniel Yakmut]

Please what are the outstanding objections. Can you make a bucket list of
that.

The Co- chairs who have being keeping an eye on the proposal and have seen
that the authors have done justice and cannot waste time on frivolous
objections.

The Co-chairs have not voilated anything. Moreso I see only several highly
subjective interpretations  of the PDP, PWDG, CPM and several other
reference manuals.

I also strongly believe the Co-chairs are also aware of the rules and they
are guided by that.

By the way nobody is afraid of appeals as it is a healthy way of saying one
was defeated in an effort and needs a second chance.

However, I have consistently said let us attack the matter and leave the
Co-chairs to do their work.

Simply
Daniel



On Oct 8, 2020 6:13 PM, "Gregoire EHOUMI via RPD" <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> I agree with Jordi on this.

>

> This is a total mess between the policy proposal versions and the

> discussions.

>

> I can see that the co-chairs did not take into account outstanding

> objections.

>

> Therefore, I urge co-chairs to reconsider this decision.

>

> --

> Gregoire

>

> On Oct. 8, 2020 3:42 a.m., JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>

> wrote:

>

> Hi Moses, all,

>

>

>

> I feel that there is a fundamental mistake here and I beg you to

> reconsider it.

>

>

>

> You've not waited for the staff confirmation about the reciprocity of the

> Inter-RIR transfers. What happens if now the staff comes back and confirms

> that we can’t decide in our policy what do to in other regions, so there is

> no reciprocity and so, we can’t implement this policy?

>

>

>

> Accordingly, I strongly suggest that you change your mind, following

> section 3.5 of the PDP: “A person who disagrees with the actions taken by

> the Chair(s) shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or with the

> PDWG”.

>

>

>

> The reasons for this are:

>

>    1. The only valid proposal version is the one that is published at the

>    web site and then announced to the list. The authors did changes several

>    times, that aren’t there. As we are discussing version 2, we should have a

>    version 2.x to show those.

>    2. The staff must confirm the reciprocity of the last 2.x version in

>    the list. As indicated in 3.4.3, you can extend the last-call to ensure

>    that this is matched.

>    3. This and other aspects, have been indicated several times by myself

>    and others during the last-call. Those are valid-objections that remain

>    unresolved and if you extend the last-call and agree with the latest

>    changes from the authors, then could make sense, otherwise, it is

>    impossible that you can declare the last-call and still “consensus”.

>

>

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Jordi

>

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> El 8/10/20 1:37, "Moses Serugo" <moses.serugo at gmail.com> escribió:

>

>

>

> Hello PDWG members,

>

>

>

> Following the last online PPM held on 16th-17th September 2020. Last call

> was announced on 21st September 2020 for the following policy proposals.

>

> ·         Board Prerogatives on the PDP

>

> ·         Resource Transfer Policy

>

> This is to further announce that the  last call period for the above

> proposals has ended, based on feedback received from the community and the

> editorial changes made by authors to address community concerns, the

> consensus decision from AFRINIC32 is still maintained.

>

> Co-Chairs will now send a report to the Board recommending ratification of

> the two above proposals in line with CPM 3.0.

>

> Regards,

>

> Co-Chairs

>

> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201008/dbb8c7a3/attachment.html>