[rpd] Decisions ... Abuse contact

[Fernando Frediani]

Hello Chloe, would you support the same reasoning for the Resource 
Transfer Policy as well ?

Regards
Fernando

On 30/09/2020 11:53, Chloe Kung wrote:
>
> Hi Jaco,
>
> I don’t see why you cannot find valid objections and hence think this 
> proposal should be in the last call. I agree with Gaby. The fact that 
> many of us are still discussing the matter and object the proposal in 
> all different reasons, is the prove of there is no reaching rough 
> consensus. And so we should not rush it into last call just because 
> some think it’s doing good or all problems have been taken care of.
>
> Like for objection d; no proper definition of the term Abuse, there is 
> still a need to address on it. Yes the proposal is about “building” 
> abuse contact, but just like what Jordi has said, “ The policy only 
> needs to state what the staff should evaluate and thus, what members 
> should do”, if the definition of the word/ act of Abuse is not clear, 
> how can the staff evaluate such action then? Let's say if they 
> interpret those cases in their own different ways, it will not be fair 
> to any of the parties nor would it be something we want I suppose. And 
> there are high chance of having mis-interpretation too!
>
> Best,
>
> Chloe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200930/308601d3/attachment.html>