[rpd] Decisions ... Abuse contact

[Fernando Frediani]

Hello Chloe, would you support the same reasoning for the Resource 
Transfer Policy as well ?

Regards
Fernando

On 30/09/2020 11:53, Chloe Kung wrote:

>

> Hi Jaco,

>

> I don’t see why you cannot find valid objections and hence think this 

> proposal should be in the last call. I agree with Gaby. The fact that 

> many of us are still discussing the matter and object the proposal in 

> all different reasons, is the prove of there is no reaching rough 

> consensus. And so we should not rush it into last call just because 

> some think it’s doing good or all problems have been taken care of.

>

> Like for objection d; no proper definition of the term Abuse, there is 

> still a need to address on it. Yes the proposal is about “building” 

> abuse contact, but just like what Jordi has said, “ The policy only 

> needs to state what the staff should evaluate and thus, what members 

> should do”, if the definition of the word/ act of Abuse is not clear, 

> how can the staff evaluate such action then? Let's say if they 

> interpret those cases in their own different ways, it will not be fair 

> to any of the parties nor would it be something we want I suppose. And 

> there are high chance of having mis-interpretation too!

>

> Best,

>

> Chloe

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200930/308601d3/attachment.html>