[rpd] PDP issues because the lack of the confirmation of dates for the new PPM

[ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE]

Dear Fernando,

1. "Criminal" Appeal committee
2. Unjustified use of the word Discrimination.
Thanks
AK

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:30 PM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>
wrote:


> Hello Abdulkarim

>

> Please let all us know which exact words Jordi used on his message that

> violated the code of conduct so we can all be aware and avoid it in future

> messages.

>

> Best regards

> Fernando

> On 07/05/2020 10:58, ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE wrote:

>

> Dear Jordi

> You have raised some critical question for us all to think about I am sure

> you do not expect a stright forward response to your questions as you know

> Africa is different from Latin America in a lot of ways.

>    Secondly, in your last email, you used some words that are not

> acceptable.  We (Co-chairs) are sure that you are aware of the code of

> conduct concerning the use of such statements on the PDWG making list or

> during the Policy meeting.  Such statements are unacceptable, and this is a

> formal warning that you should refrain from the use of such words. We

> understand that you are not satisfied with the appeal, but there are ways

> in which this can be resolved. As far as we Co-chairs are concerned the

> ruling of the appeal committe means that our decision was upheld, meaning

> the policy proposal goes back to the discussion stage. This should not

> result in you using unacceptable language; rather, you should put your

> energy into convincing the community about the policy during the next

> Policy meeting.

> Please be warned.

> Thank you

>

> Co-Chair

> PDWG

>

>

> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:59 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <

> rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

>

>> Hi all,

>>

>> Because the dates of the next Public Policy Meeting (PPM) are unknown,

>> there is a problem with the PDP in several aspects:

>>

>> 1) Deadlines for new policy proposals are unknown.

>> 2) Deadlines for new versions of existing policy proposals are unknown.

>> 3) Co-chair elections timing is unknown.

>>

>> Further to that, the lack of response on the board and the co-chairs,

>> regarding the criminal appeal comitte agression to the PDP discriminating

>> authors of proposals by not allowing them to be part of the community for

>> an appeal as indicated in 3.5.1 of the CPM, also creates an additional

>> trouble. We are in a limbo state with this proposal. Should we accept the

>> aggression to the PDP and send the existing text again? On what timing

>> basis? Should we ask the co-chairs to make sure that the PDP is respected?

>> Should the board take an action on that?

>>

>> It is a must to know *NOW* (already too close to the 4 weeks deadline) if

>> we are going to hold a on-line PPM in the same dates as originally

>> scheduled, or what is the new date, or if we will just have one meeting

>> this year, with the same dates as already scheduled?

>>

>> The Covid-19 is affecting everyone, and it is very sad, but most of our

>> work is done ir can be done remotelly. There are no excuses to avoid

>> continuing doing our work, but we need to get an *urgent* confirmation from

>> the co-chairs and board about all the matters I've indicated above.

>>

>> As a side note, all the other RIRs (and the IETF and ICANN already did)

>> are doing the meetings on-line. In fact, today we have the equivalent to

>> the PPM for LACNIC. The only issue is a reduced agenda, so only 3 policy

>> proposals are being discussed, and still there will be consensus

>> determination for them.

>>

>> By the way if you're interested to participate in the LACNIC, there is

>> simultaneous english/portuguess/spanish transcription and anyone can

>> participate:

>> https://www.lacnic.net/4191/56/evento/welcome-to-lacnic-33-online. The

>> agenda of the PPM is here:

>> https://www.lacnic.net/4487/56/evento/open-policy-forum.

>>

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jordi

>> @jordipalet

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> **********************************************

>> IPv4 is over

>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

>> http://www.theipv6company.com

>> The IPv6 Company

>>

>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

>> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

>> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

>> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

>> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

>> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

>> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

>> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

>> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

>> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

>> communication and delete it.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>

>

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200507/5ab70584/attachment.html>