[rpd] End of LAST call (was Re: RPD Digest ...)

[Noah]

On Fri, 31 Jan 2020, 00:17 Mike Silber, <silber.mike at gmail.com> wrote:

> PLEASE edit the subject line if you are responding to to a digest thread.
>
> Thanks for your comment Fernando.
>
> I think it is far more difficult than you explain and even less likely to
> happen.
>
> That being said - the objection was raised before, without any
> justification. A number of us asked the writers to please substantiate
> their objection and explain their purported risk. The writers failed to
> provide any justification for their view.
>
> Simply repeating an unsubstantiated and frankly unsustainable objection
> does not make it valid.
>
> Given there is no technical or legal justification provided, I think the
> objection can be disregard as unsubstantiated.
>


Indeed, repeating, rephrasing an unsubstantial  objection never make it
valid. We have been struggling to get this obvious and common sense truth
acceptable here for a while.

Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200131/1bd92890/attachment.html>