[rpd] AFRINIC Number Resources Transfer Policy

[Fernando Frediani]

In practice this situation you describe is very hard to happen, we 
cannot have things in place to treat the very unlikely situation and 
that Phase 2 is about to happen soon. Until there the vast majority or 
organization (really the vast!) can get addresses from AfriNic fine.
I hardly doubt one can justify anything more than a /13 at once at the 
moment. Even in a remote hypothesis that is possible the organization 
can receive the /13 and work with that until transfers are allowed as 
per Jordi's proposal that has been changed to start with Phase 2 is 
triggered and that organization will be able to transfer whatever else 
is needed.
One rule for all and much simpler.

Fernando

On 10/11/2019 18:51, Owen DeLong wrote:

>

>

>> On Nov 10, 2019, at 10:51 , Chevalier du Borg <virtual.borg at gmail.com 

>> <mailto:virtual.borg at gmail.com>> wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>> Le dim. 10 nov. 2019 à 21:58, Jaco Kroon <jaco at uls.co.za 

>> <mailto:jaco at uls.co.za>> a écrit :

>>

>>     Hi Chevalier.

>>

>>     Please allow me to be blunt.  That's short sighted.

>>

>>     We cannot transfer IN from other regions unless we allow OUT.

>>

>>

>> Agree 100%,

>> Then you have no problems with wait till all RIRs are equal run out 

>> before we etablish full in and out transfer policy no?

>>

>>     All the other RIRs require reciprocal *compatible* policies,

>>     which means bi-directional transfers.

>>

>>

>>

>> All RIRs don't all have equal amount of free space. Big difference

>

> Depending on your definition here, 4 out of 5 have exactly equal 

> amount == 0.

>

>>     Not allowing this means we can't get resources in either.

>>

>>

>> While AfriNIC have free space, operators don't need it

>> When it run out, then we can allow transfer policy

>

> This isn’t entirely true.

>

> It’s possible that an operator needs more than they can get via 

> current AfriNIC policies due to “soft landing” limitations.

>

> In such a case, said operator might prefer to transfer a large amount 

> of space in even if they are paying for it on the market

> rather than suffer with the small amount of space they can get from 

> AfriNIC due to the current restrictions.

>

> Is there a valid reason to preclude such a transfer which, in reality, 

> prolongs the AfriNIC free pool to the benefit of other

> organizations in Africa?

>

> Owen

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20191110/6961beb6/attachment.html>