[rpd] timing for impact analysis

[Komi Elitcha]

Hi Owen,


> On Jul 12, 2019, at 1:53 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> […]
>> 
> 
> This is not particularly difficult to solve. 3.4.1 states “at least”. It doesn’t state that the proposal is entitled to be evaluated for consensus if it is available 4 weeks and 1 day before the meeting.
> 
> I agree that it would be good to update 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 to provide better timeframes (I suggest an 8 week period in 3.4.1 and a 5 week freeze for changes other than those to address the impact analysis or changes of a strictly “editorial” nature.).
> 

Let's not  take the easy path with quick  patches.  With all these known weaknesses and limits, it is better to solve all the identified issues and have a new PDP which reflects what we learnt from  past and project us in the future.

>>> 
>>> […]
>> 
>> What will increase participation is a clear and well documented multi steps  PDP led by experienced chairs, who make sure every views are heard in a less aggressive and well moderated  working group, where  cultural and linguistic diversity are promoted, issues and objections  are tracked, addressed and resolved.
>> Such PDP will attract participation and produce good policies and  contribute to the education  of the community.
> 
> Agreed…
> 
>> That is what PDP-BIS  is about
> 
> I think it misses that mark in a number of ways.

We seem to have an agreement  somewhere here.  Can you  please elaborate on  what makes PDP-bis miss this mark and  please  offer  amendements ?

> 
> Owen
> 
>> 
>> 
>> - Komi
>> 
- Komi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190714/157e9435/attachment.html>