[rpd] delay in messages

Thu Jun 27 06:09:04 UTC 2019

Hi Jordi,
Concerning the messages getting late when sent issue should be attended to
please. This is so inconvenient for most of us who would have suggested to
an issue and then later discover someone else has answered the questions.
I really don't understand what's the difference between the digest mode and
the real time. I really don't see a difference. Both modes delay messages.
So please we need a fix.

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, 5:29 AM , <rpd-request at afrinic.net> wrote:

> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>         rpd at afrinic.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         rpd-request at afrinic.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Assisted Registry Checks (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
>    2. Re: delay in messages (Ernest Byaruhanga)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 18:08:49 +0200
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> To: <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Assisted Registry Checks
> Message-ID: <09AFD9E2-CE6D-4D62-83DA-A5B93A10D3C9 at consulintel.es>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> See below, in-line. I think you?re getting confused ?
>
>
>
> El 26/6/19 17:53, "Sylvain BAYA" <abscoco at gmail.com> escribi?:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please see below (inline)...
>
>
>
> Le 6/26/2019 ? 9:36 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD a ?crit :
>
> I just got one idea ? One possibility to make it more neutral and having
> the knowledge of the operational insights ?
>
>
>
>  Hi Jordi, if i'm getting you well, (permit me please) you are saying that
> it if we need a policy proposal turned as an operational procedure, we
> should leave the exclisivity up to the Staff to submit it to the PDWG prior
> to be implemented... Am i wrong ?
>
>
>
> 1: I don?t believe something like the ARC should be a policy. It is just
> an operational issue. The RSA already allows the staff to tackle it.
>
>
>
> Even if normally the staff doesn?t submit policy proposals, is perfectly
> valid. Nothing is against that in the PDP. They follow exactly the same
> process: the community must also approve it.
>
>
>
>  IMHO, i see no real need (yes :-) the neutrality you mentioned above) to
> *Varying the process* here. I mean someone, from the PDWG, should just
> submit it (if needed), then it will follow the normal PDP (Impact Analysis
> Report will raise the Staff concern then).
>
>
>
> 2: Mixing things doesn?t help at all to have all this clearer. I?m not
> saying the staff needs to use the variance process at all. I?m saying that
> if the community believes this should be a policy (I don?t think is
> needed), it is just fine, according to the PDP (nothing special), that this
> policy proposal is done by the staff and the community will need to agree
> on consensus, just like *any other policy proposal*
>
>
>
> My point is that, we want the Staff more proactive [1], to *timely*
> provide needed information (including legal one) both onlist and at PPM
> (CPM section 3.4.0), to *timely* provide Impact Analysis Reports (CPM
> section 3.4.1)...and as actually proven, it's not easy to get it done.
>
>
>
> 3: Again, don?t mix things, I?m not talking about the impact analysis. You
> can see the email subject is ARC.
>
>
>
> This way it was developed in RIPE NCC.
>
>
>
> Maybe Ernest, Madhvi or other staff want to take it?
>
>
>
> ...i don't think that they should be involved in the PDP as author, even
> just in case of emergency :-)
>
> Is there not also a bit of *conflict of interest* ?
>
>
>
> 4: No variance, the PDP allows the staff to submit policy proposals.
> Doesn?t happen often, but is quite admissible if we want the ARC to be a
> policy instead of just an operational procedure.
>
>
>
> Again, they could do this just an operational procedure, but if we prefer
> a policy, this is nice way in the middle.
>
>
>
> Ok with that, and again i see no problem if any other participant (or an
> other special WG which may exist ?) decides to author|submit such an
> operational policy proposal :-)
>
> __
>
> [1]: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009626.html>
>
>
>
> Shalom,
>
> --sb.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El 26/6/19 10:29, "Nasir Faruk" <nasirfaruk at gmail.com> escribi?:
>
>
>
> @SOUAD ABIDI,
>
>
>
> I think the author sent ARC document as a suggestion or rather something
> worth looking at that could assists to shape the discussion on INR. I am
> sure it's presented as a new proposal.
>
>
>
> @Dewole, i hope i'm right?
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Faruk.
>
>
>
>
>
> ..........................................................................................................
> [...]
> --
>
> Regards,
> Sylvain B.
> <http://www.chretiennement.org>
> __
> Website : <https://www.cmnog.cm>
> Wiki : <https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki>
> Surveys : <https://survey.cmnog.cm>
> Subscribe to Mailing List : <
> https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
> Mailing List's Archives : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/pipermail/cmnog/>
> Last Event's Feed : <https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOGlab3>
> <https://twitter.com/cmN0G>
> <https://facebook.com/cmNOG>
> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/REBOOTcmNOG>
> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOG>
> <https://cmnog.wordpress.com/>
> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/810ecae1/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:28:46 +0300
> From: Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>
> To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> Cc: rpd at afrinic.net
> Subject: Re: [rpd] delay in messages
> Message-ID: <C94A9402-A17F-4869-8FFE-E591374F683F at afrinic.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8
>
> Jordi,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> We shall investigate and get it resolved.
>
> Ernest.
>
>
> > I've a question about the RPD list.
> >
> > When I send a message to the list, it takes over 5-10 minutes to come
> back.?
> >
> > This doesn't happen with the community list, for example. So that's why
> I don't think is something in my side.
> >
> > This is annoying, because 1) you're not sure if the message was actually
> sent, 2) it may look as if the list is being moderated (I'm sure is not),
> 3) sometimes you respond a message that already somebody else provided
> responses for, creating unnecessary traffic (and this is probably the most
> important reason to resolve it).
> >
> > Example: My last response to Moses, was sent at 12:26 (my local time).
> However, only did to the list at 12:33.
> >
> > If this helps to investigate the issue, the header of the message in the
> list, shows that both, my server and Afrinic one use IPv6 and that my
> message was well received, with DMARC, SPF and DKIM correctly set.
> >
> > Received by mx.afrinic.net Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:26:54
> > There is a small spamfilter delay (spamfilter.afrinic.net Tue, 25 Jun
> 2019 10:27:03)
> >
> > However:
> > from lists.afrinic.net Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:33:06 +0200
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jordi
> > @jordipalet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 153, Issue 215
> *************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190627/1dde7aee/attachment.html>